|
wing // User Search
wing // User Search
Jul 27, 2001, 3:15pm
I'm entitled to one for putting up with all the morons here, right? www.systemrecall.com
Some of the funniest stuff you've ever read on life's toughest and most sensitive issues and the world through the eyes of two
Maryland teenagers.
Jul 27, 2001, 6:32pm
That's why it's a shameless plug rather than a plug.
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message news:3b61c462$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You're one of these Maryland teenagers, I take it?
>
> SW Chris
>
> "wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
> news:3b61a1bd at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> www.systemrecall.com
> sensitive issues and the world through the eyes of two
>
>
|
Jul 30, 2001, 11:14pm
I'm bored outta my mind, so I'm gonna make this somewhat entertaining, to me anyway.
Situation:
Test machine K6300
Running OS WinXP Preview Program borrowed from friend that was a dumbass and paid for it
AW Viewscreen 100% white
Not a clue about the version of DirectX, it won't accept a 7.0 install.
Windows properietary TNT2 Vanta LT drivers (Won't accept Detonators)
Windows proprietary Creative Ensoniq AudioPCI drivers
Hardware configuration:
AMD K6-2 300 CPU (Barely runs the friggin OS)
128mb RAM (Barely enough to contain the OS)
2gb HDD (The OS fits, but rather snugly)
Intel 56k Winmodem
Creative Ensoniq AudioPCI
VideoExcell TNT2 Vanta LT
Jul 31, 2001, 3:54pm
Between that and it's unwillingness to accept my own drivers (Which were all designed for Win9x) or their Win2k counterparts is
definitely the problem. As soon as XP starts going OEM to Dell and the like, may god help us all........
[View Quote]"gamer" <Robbie at AWlife.net> wrote in message news:3b6683b9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Simple explanation problem Wing :)
> AW and DirectX are both dodgy on Windows 2000 right?
>
> Well unlike 98 and ME that were built from 95, Windows XP was built fro mthe
> foundations of Windows 2000. So although its more stable that Win95 and 98,
> it has all the incompatabilites that Windows 2000 and more too.
>
> Get that lame-ass preview off your HD now and get good ol' 98 or ME back on
> :)
>
> "wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
> news:3b66066e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> me anyway.
> and paid for it
>
>
|
Jul 31, 2001, 7:30pm
nonono, when XP goes OEM, people buying their brand spanking new top of the line $3800 Dell Dimension 8100 with it's "Lightning fast
Pentium 4" will be MUCH MUCH dumber on the whole. XP is leaving later today, heh. Win98 shall return.
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message news:3b66f245 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> who cares, you just don't use it... install a Win98SE at once...
>
> KAH
>
> "wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
> news:3b66f0d2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> all designed for Win9x) or their Win2k counterparts is
> like, may god help us all........
> news:3b6683b9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> mthe
> 98,
> on
> to
> dumbass
> install.
>
>
|
Jul 31, 2001, 10:14pm
Have any problems with OGL games? It would seem that the drivers that M$ supplied for my TNT2 don't support OGL......
[View Quote]"american police" <bob at bobscalot.com> wrote in message news:3b6705f2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> AW works on WinXP for me
>
> --American Police
>
>
|
Aug 1, 2001, 6:32pm
*shrug* Never again, never again.
(GIVE ME AW FOR LINUX OR GIVE ME BILL GATE'S DEATH)
[View Quote]"perseus" <theperseus at optushome.com.au> wrote in message news:3b67cbef at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> This is what u all get for trusting ur decent computers to a dodgy company
> like microsoft, shame on you......
>
>
> "wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
> news:3b6749f4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> supplied for my TNT2 don't support OGL......
> news:3b6705f2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Aug 3, 2001, 5:01pm
Heh, Microsoft has a history of making Previews worse than full releases. I.E. WinME pre-release didn't give registry errors every
20 boots (That just isn't my problem either, it shows up on machines OEMed with ME)
The roots of my problem are probably tracable to the 1998 vintage hardware vs. extreme bloatware.
[View Quote]"captain mad mike" <cmadmike at crosswinds.net> wrote in message news:3b6aef59$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Wing you also fail to realize the words "Preview Program" as in PRE RELEASE,
> as in it may CHANGE from now until october when it is released. And also the
> peipheral makers haven't really begun to make drivers SPECIFICALLY for WinXP
> yet, and were you even using Win2000 drivers? (actually, you need Win2000
> drivers for XP)
> "wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
> news:3b672389$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the line $3800 Dell Dimension 8100 with it's "Lightning fast
> today, heh. Win98 shall return.
> news:3b66f245 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> were
> fro
> and
> back
> entertaining,
> Detonators)
>
>
|
Aug 1, 2001, 6:19pm
Oh, they didn't play nicely?
[View Quote]"facter" <"Facter at AWsupport"> wrote in message news:3b683c0b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> This issue was addressed, I think those who think about it a little will
> understand the nature of the situation.
>
> F.
>
> "rc dodge viper" <RC_DodgeViper at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b681019 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> its
> read
> now:
> 2
>
>
|
Aug 1, 2001, 11:33pm
I realized this shortly after posting. However, that still isn't playing nice.
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3b68ac1d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> i think what facter is talking about is credit card fraud
>
> "wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
> news:3b686451 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> news:3b683c0b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> says
> of my
> Everything is
> you
> its
> plus
> WHY IS
> "Code
> soon!!!
>
>
|
Aug 12, 2001, 8:47pm
You're one very troubled child. One more unproductive, unneccessary flame and you're offically a 0 on my list.
BTW, Fac's post was most certainly not off-topic. Learn to read.
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3b76eeaa at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> This is fucking pitiful.. the own AW worker posts off-topic shit.. AW has
> officially become a 3 on my list..
>
> "facter" <facter at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3b6d7b96 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> ordered
>
>
|
Aug 2, 2001, 6:07pm
Just associate .cgi files with AW. This is perfectly fine assuming you don't edit CGI files...
[View Quote]"cyberboy" <adam at comcat.com> wrote in message news:3b68daed$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If I use my Internet Explorer 5.5 browser stand-alone (not in the AW
> browser), none of the teleport links will work.
> Yet using the AW browser (IE 5.5 still), allows all teleport links to work
> fine.
> Any suggestions on setting changes I might make to my IE 5.5 so when I use
> it stand-alone, it will automatically open AW software and complete the
> teleport link like it used to and like Netscape does?
> Thanx,
> CyberBoy
>
> --
> Please visit my website
> http://www.2virtualdreams.com
>
>
|
Aug 5, 2001, 9:27pm
This is the closest it gets. Damn man, and people complain that plaintext posting is in the past.
[View Quote]"anduin lothario" <anduin at anduin-lothario.com> wrote in message news:3b6db77b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone on ActiveWorlds actually has a BBS system which
> allows us to telnet to?
>
> If any of you actually KNOW what one is? lol
>
> If you have one, please let me know :D
>
> --
> ,,,,,
> (o o)
> --ooO-(_)-Ooo---
> ___|___|___|___|_
> _|___|___|___|___
> ___| Andy |___|_
> _|___|___|___|___
> ___|___|___|___|_
> --ooO-----Ooo---
>
> --==[(/ ÅñÐûïÑ LøTHåRïø \)]==--
> http://www.anduin-lothario.com
> --==[(/ ÅñÐûïÑ LøTHåRïø \)]==--
>
>
|
Aug 6, 2001, 1:30am
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B6E0274.8AB513C6 at tnlc.com...
> Dude, BBSes are so early 1990s. They're, like, obsolete d00d.
|
Uh oh, you're using 21'st century spellings now. Not to mention combining it with 1980's-early 90's grammar.
Aug 5, 2001, 9:56pm
GENERAL DISCUSSION!
And yes, anything that M$ does is known to slow down computers :)
[View Quote]"ryan." <RyanBirkin at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3b6ddb4e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> i have a desktop theme on and i dont know if its making my computer slow....
> Can somone tell me if they are known to slow down your computer..
>
> thanks
>
> RyanBirkin at hotmail.com
> Ryan.
>
>
|
Aug 7, 2001, 5:28pm
*grin* Typical. Ingenius though, one of the more creative worms that I've seen in awhile. Not malicious in itself, except for the
rebooting. However, 600k servers in one day, that means that mathematically, by the time the worm stops propagating in October, ALL
W2k and NT4 systems that havn't been patched are infected. *thwacks M$ in the head*
[View Quote]"andras" <andras at andras.net> wrote in message news:3B702530.6606912B at andras.net...
>
>
> Everyone who is running IIS4 or higher on W2K or NT4 probably interested to read this article.
> 600,000 server infected so far :(
> Andras
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Complete Analysis of CodeRedII
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 00:39:07 -0700
> From: Steve Gibson <support at grc.com>
> Newsgroups: grc.news,grc.news.feedback
> Followup-To: grc.news.feedback
>
> Folks,
>
> Here's the clearest and most complete analysis I've seen so far.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Code Red II Worm Analysis Update
> =================================
> The new worm that was first noticed yesterday has been
> analyzed. Here is a summary of the facts based on the
> excellent analyses referenced at the bottom of this page.
>
>
> EXPLOITED VULNERABILITY
> ------------------------
> This worm uses the same mechanism as the original Code
> Red worm to infect vulnerable servers. That is, the
> worm looks for IIS servers that have not patched the
> unchecked buffer vulnerability in idq.dll or removed
> the ISAPI script mappings. See the Code Red Patch FAQ
> at http://www.incidents.org/react/code_red.php for
> information on patching systems to remove the vulnerability.
>
> Except for using the buffer overflow mechanism in order
> to get the worm code executed on a vulnerable IIS server,
> this new worm is entirely different from the original Code
> Red CRv1 and CRv2 variants.
>
> Note: According to eEye, the worm code will be successfully
> executed only on a Win2000 system running a vulnerable IIS
> server, WinNT-based IIS servers will simply crash when
> attempting to execute the worm code. Our experiments and
> reports received from users confirm this finding.
>
>
> BACKDOOR
> --------
> The most damaging property of this new worm is that the worm
> creates a back door on an infected server, leaving the system
> wide open to any attacker.
>
> The worm copies %windir%\CMD.EXE to the following locations:
> c:\inetpub\scripts\root.exe
> c:\progra~1\common~1\system\MSADC\root.exe
> d:\inetpub\scripts\root.exe
> d:\progra~1\common~1\system\MSADC\root.exe
>
> This provides a means for a remote attacker to execute
> arbitrary commands on the compromised server.
>
> In addition, the worm creates a trojan copy of explorer.exe
> as described below. Due to the actions of the trojan
> explorer.exe, IIS will make the C: and D: root directories
> accessible to a remote attacker even if the root.exe
> command shell program is removed from the scripts and
> msadc directories.
>
>
> TROJAN EXPLORER.EXE
> --------------------
> The worm carries its own copy of explorer.exe. The worm
> places its own copy of explorer.exe at c:\explorer.exe
> and d:\explorer.exe. By placing the trojan file in these
> locations, Windows will find and run the trojan rather
> than the real explorer.exe because of the way Windows
> seaches for executables by default. Specifically, unless
> the system has been patched against the "Relative Shell
> Path" vulnerability, the trojan explorer.exe will be
> executed when the next user logs into the system. (See
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS00-052.asp)
>
> Upon execution, the trojan first runs the real explorer.exe
> (thus the user will not notice any problems) and then goes
> on to modify the system registry as outlined below.
>
> First, the trojan program adds the value SFCDisable=0xFFFFFF9D
> to HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\WindowsNT\CurrentVersion\Winlogin.
> This registry setting completely disables the Windows File
> Protection (WFP) mechanism. WFP prevents the replacement of
> certain monitored system files. See the following for more info:
> http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q222/1/93.ASP
>
> Next, the trojan sets the following "Virtual Roots" in the registry:
> SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\W3SVC\Parameters\Virtual Roots
> \scripts to
> ,,217
> SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\W3SVC\Parameters\Virtual Roots
> \msadc to
> ,,217
> These "217" settings ensure that the scripts and msadc directories
> (which contain the root.exe copy of cmd.exe) have read/write/execute
> permission.
>
> Finally the trojan sets these two "Virtual Root" values as well:
> SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\W3SVC\Parameters\Virtual Roots\c to
> c:\,,217
> SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\W3SVC\Parameters\Virtual Roots\d to
> d:\,,217
> These mappings, which do not normally exist, map the root C: and D:
> drives to a place where IIS can find them, namely /c and /d. The
> permissions here are also set to read/write/execute.
>
> Quoting eEye's analysis, the purpose of these mappings are described:
> --------
> Basically the above code creates a virtual web path (/c and /d) which
> maps
> /c to c:\ and /d to d:\. The writer of this worm has put in this
> functionality to allow for a backdoor to be placed on the system so
> even if
> you remove the root.exe (cmd.exe prompt) from your /scripts folder an
> attacker can still use the /c and /d virtual roots to compromise your
> system. The attacks would basically look like:
>
> http://IpAddress/c/inetpub/scripts/root.exe?/c+dir (if root.exe was
> still
> there) or:
> http://IpAddress/c/winnt/system32/cmd.exe?/c+dir (Where dir could be
> any
> command an attacker would want to execute).
> ----------
>
> Note that the trojan explorer.exe need only be executed once for
> these registry changes to be made. Thus, all the backdoors are
> enabled, and continue to be enabled, forever after, regardless
> of whether or not explorer.exe is running.
>
> To emphasize, note that even killing the trojan explorer.exe process
> will not remove the back doors. Further, even killing the
> explorer.exe
> process and removing the copies of root.exe and deleting the registry
> settings will not eliminate the backdoors. If the trojan explorer.exe
> is executed again (e.g. when the next person logs in), the registry
> settings will be reinstated, making the C: and D: drives again
> externally accessible. Finally, note that even deleting the registry
> settings, removing the copies of root.exe, and removing the trojan
> explorer.exe is not sufficient to clean the system. During the
> time the system was backdoored any other attacker could have
> installed new backdoors that are not associated with this worm.
>
> The trojan process sleeps most of the time, but wakes
> to loop through these registry key modification steps every
> 10 minutes. This way, even if an administrator notices the
> registry settings and deletes them, the trojan will reinstate
> the settings a few minutes later.
>
>
> PROPAGATION
> -----------
> How aggressively the worm attempts to propagate itself
> depends on whether or not Chinese is the language installed on
> the system. If Chinese, the worm creates 600 threads and
> attempts to spread for 48 hours. If non-Chinese, the worm
> creates 300 threads and attempts to spread for 24 hours.
> After the infection-spreading interval, the system is
> forcibly rebooted. The reboot flushes the memory resident worm,
> and leaves the backdoors and the explorer.exe trojan in
> place.
>
>
> TARGET SELECTION
> -----------------
> The 300 or 600 worm threads all work simultaneously to
> propagate the infection. Each chooses a random target IP
> and then uses one of the following masks with the given
> probabilities.The masked parts of the IP are replaced
> with the host computer's own IP information. Thus, the
> worm mostly confines its targeting to IP addresses close
> to the host computer's own.
>
> 0.0.0.0 (probability 12.5%) => random
> 255.0.0.0 (probability 50.0%) => same class A
> 255.255.0.0 (probability 37.5%) => same class B
>
> Target IPs which are excluded are 127.x.x.x and 224.x.x.x,
> and no octet is allowed to be 0 or 255. In addition, the
> host will not attempt to re-infect itself.
>
>
> INFECTION PROCESS
> -----------------
> Before each attempt to connect to a new target, the worm
> checks the local time to see if the year is less than 2002
> and if the month is less than 10. If either of these checks
> return false, then the worm ceases the propagation cycle
> and reboots the server. Note that this implies that all worms
> will cease propagating by Oct. 1, 2001.
>
> To aid performance, the worm uses a nonblocking socket to connect
> to each target. Specifically this means that if one thread is
> stuck waiting for a slow connection to a particular target,
> the wait will not slow down the rest of the threads from continuing
> their scanning function.
>
> After making a successful connection with a target (the three way
> handshake has completed), the worm thread uploads all of the
> worm code at once, looks for an acknowledgement, and then moves on
> to attempting to infect other hosts.
>
> When a worm first arrives on a target and begins execution, the
> worm checks to see if the host has already been infected, and if
> so, disables itself. Specifically, the worm checks to see a CodeRedII
> atom has been placed using "GlobalFindAtomA". If the worm finds that
> the atom exists then it goes to sleep forever. If the CodeRedII atom
> does not exist, the worm creates the atom and continues execution.
>
>
> DOWNLOADS
> ---------
> Corecode provides a .zip file containing a IDA Pro project file
> and a plaintext disassembly for both the worm and the trojan
> explorer.exe at:
> http://www.eikon.tum.de/~simons/ida_root/
>
> To download the eEye analysis and their disassembly files:
> http://www.eeye.com/html/advisories/coderedII.zip
>
> The worm binary can be found at the Unixwiz site:
> http://www.unixwiz.net/techtips/CodeRedII.html
>
>
> REFERENCES
> -----------
> Corecode's Analysis:
> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/incidents/2001-08/0092.html
>
> NAI's Analysis:
> http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusChar.asp?virus_k=99177
>
> eEye's Analysis:
> http://www.eeye.com/html/advisories/coderedII.zip
>
> SecurityFocus Analysis:
> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2001-08/0066.html
>
>
> ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
> -----------------
> We are very grateful to Jesper Johansson for reviewing this
> report and providing many helpful suggestions and technical details.
>
> Many thanks are due to corecode, who stayed up all night and provided
> the very first analysis of the worm binary to the public.
>
> We'd also like to recognize Stephen Friedl of Unixwiz for performing
> a higher level analysis last night and posting his findings to the
> web
> before any other concrete information was available.
>
> Also, we thank Matt Scarborough for testing the worm on WinNT
> to confirm that these systems crash rather than running worm
> code successfully.
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Steve Gibson, at work on: < a million loose ends >
|
Aug 8, 2001, 12:39pm
[View Quote]"andras" <andras at andras.net> wrote in message news:3B70E522.51567F51 at andras.net...
> john viper wrote:
>
> You won't believe but %95 of those infected machines running IIS probably without the knowledge of the machine's owner! They have
no webpages at all - just the standard "Under construction" default from MS.
> Most likely those ppl installed W2K without disabling the IIS install (it is installed by default). Of course they don't care
about any security advisory (MS patches, etc) so it is easy to infect them.
> Thanks to M$ to make "secure" OSs :((
|
Theres a rule that I always follow while installing M$ O$'s. NEVER do a typical install. It installs components you don't want and
not the ones that you DO want (Solitaire but no charmap, IIS but no Dialup networking, IPX/SPX protocols but no TCP/IP, demented
things like that)
Aug 8, 2001, 12:42pm
Also, who installed it? I don't trust most technicians as far as I could throw them.
[View Quote]"tyrell" <tyrell1 at sk.sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:3B70E659.39DCA3B6 at sk.sympatico.ca...
> First thing(s) I would do is start to eliminate possible problems thusly:
>
> Can other CD-RWs read a disk you create...
>
> Can you read one created from someone else's CD-RW
>
> Hopefully you'r not doing all your 'testing' with the same CD etc... If so try a
> different disk... If you have a friend with some disks, borrow one of his/hers
> and try it...
>
> As 'Seven of Nine' (or is it Tuvok?) says; start looking for the cause of your
> problem by figuring out what it 'isn't'...
>
> Good luck... :-)
>
> data21 wrote:
>
>
> --
> Tyrell - Alpha Prime - 21.8s 457e 90 - "Mundus vult decipi"
> "Eat well, stay fit, die anyway."
> http://www3.sk.sympatico.ca/ty1/index.html
> http://www.dlcwest.com/~rpatter/index.html
> ICQ UN - 272905
> All those who believe in psychokinesis raise my hand.
>
>
|
Aug 8, 2001, 4:36pm
Are all the CDRWs from the same "batch"? (Were they bought at the same time and place and brand?) If they were, they might have all
gone faulty, because simultanious death to both drives is an extreme rarity. Perhaps Windows has fucked up? Do CDRs work? Do you
have all your IDE drives manually jumpered to Master/Slave? Cable select and Windows don't always get along..... If you can't find
any other cause, try installing Windows on top of your current copy. Won't require formatting and will fix most problems a format
would.
[View Quote]"data21" <dbmiller at kiski.net> wrote in message news:3b7154c4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I believe that was Tuvok :-)
> Yes I tried other CDRW type CD's, even blank ones to see if the formatting
> would start for them.
> Then I put in a used one or a blank one all I get is device not ready, for
> all my drives.
> I only get this when trying to read or write to a CDRW type CD.
>
>
>
> "tyrell" <tyrell1 at sk.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:3B70E659.39DCA3B6 at sk.sympatico.ca...
> try a
> his/hers
> your
> and I
> till
> notice
> book
> windows98.
> backing
>
>
|
Aug 8, 2001, 9:51pm
Simple solution, if it didn't ship in the case, don't put it there. Dells are picky about anything and everything. Cable select and
Windows don't work right half the time with either multiple CDROMs or multiple hard drives or both. Dell power supplies are normally
insufficient, etc. etc. etc.
[View Quote]"casay" <casay2 at home.com> wrote in message news:3b718668 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I just got a brand new Yamaha lightspeed 2100EZ 16X write, 10X rewright, 40X
> read, 40X rip. Out of the box it has almost the same problems.
> Dell
> Running Win Me.
> 800 P III
> 128 MB Ram
> I have another 48x CD Rom drive.
> Running Roxio ( Adaptec) Direct CD and Easy CD Creator.
> Running tests as per Yamahas instructions through Easy CD Creator.
> Installed all the latest software and firmware updates.
> All devices showing correctly in Bios
>
> Both drives read music disks although neither will automatically pull up a
> music program and play the songs anymore. I have to open up a music player
> and select the files to play.
> Both will read and start up a game disk as normal.
>
> The CD burner will test to read audio files from the 48x CD ROM but it won't
> test data files.
> It won't run any test from my hard drive and gets stuck on 'finding data
> files for testing'.
>
> Info/tips from Dell and Yamaha-
> All Dell PC's have the CDROM jumper set to CSEL (not master) and I was told
> to put the CD burner to CSEL too. Tried that, didn't work.
> Put 48X on master, burner on slave. Same problem.
>
> Final solution- Told that drive is defective and send back to where I bought
> it. :-(
>
> If anyone has any other idea as to what may be wrong or conflicting here
> before I send it back it would be greatly appreciated. I personally think
> there's some conflict someplace between the software and the burner but I'm
> probably wrong.
>
> Casay
>
>
>
>
> "raven shadow" <ravenshadow001 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b7179f0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> MS
> working
> and
>
|
Aug 8, 2001, 11:29pm
The server is a server, you don't wanna fuck with people rich enough to buy high end servers. Laptops are simple machines, only have
a few options, don't have to deal with variables like IDE cable, M/S/CS jumpers, BIOS, etc. Though I'd still rather spend $2000
cramming a full size Athlon based ATX PC into a briefcase (I've seen it done) and devising a battery system than buying a $3000
Pentium 3 based laptop.
The desktops on the other hand, are incredibly overpriced and incredibly picky and unending in their bitch-fits about new hardware
(This is from experiences with all 3 current production model Dimensions, the L, 4100 and 8100)
[View Quote]"jerme" <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:3b71dca5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I have a Dell PowerEdge server. It has a good sized array of scsi disks,
> dual procs... The power supply is way more than sufficient, and i've never
> had any problems with it. Also have a 1Ghz Latitude. It's awesome... The
> only problem I have ever had is that the switch that wakes the laptop when
> you raise the LCD seems to be a little picky. It takes a few times of
> opening and closing before it will wake up from standby.... Though, this
> isn't a major problem...just sorta annoying at times.... From those 2
> system purchases I have over $500 in free equipment. With the server I got,
> a $400 scsi disk for $60, plus double the HD size on 2 of the disks. With
> the Latitude I got a free port replicator and a Palm M100. I've very
> impressed with Dell's systems, and their customer service/support. I'd
> amazed that you seem to have had bad experiences with them. The only thing I
> would recommend more than buying a Dell is building your own..... ;-)
>
> -J.
>
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jeremy Booker
> JTech Web Systems
> (www.JTechWebSystems.com -- Coming Soon)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> "wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
> news:3b71d080 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> are picky about anything and everything. Cable select and
> multiple hard drives or both. Dell power supplies are normally
>
> <snip>
>
>
|
Aug 9, 2001, 12:43am
Now that I've recieved word that the high school truly IS going to allow laptop computers to any student who wishes to use one, I'm
interested in shopping for one. Since it's too short notice to build a full ATX PC into a breifcase (plus that'd be kinda heavy to
lug around) I guess I'm going to look into buying one. I've decided that I don't need anything particularly fancy, just a 13+ inch
screen, a CD, floppy and at least 10 gigs of HDD. An A/C adapter is also neccessary (Hah, knowing me the battery would die in the
middle of somthing important). At least 800MHz of Pentium 3 (Or any AMD mobile CPU) is neccessary. The OS should be Win2k, but if
it's cheap enough I'll settle for ME or XP.
3d graphics a neccessity, doesn't matter what brand so long as it'll do some 3d rendering. A 10/100 ethernet adapter would be nice
as well, or at least some way to connect it directly to any normal PC (Can you do null modem via USB?) Modem not neccessary.
Carrying weight doesn't matter, but price does. Preferably less than $2000 when all is said and done. If anyone can point me in the
general direction of a few companies (I don't care if they're big name so long as they do good work) it would be much appreciated.
BTW, I'm also looking at iBooks, but they're just too fruity in color, so don't tell me about that
Aug 9, 2001, 12:55am
Forgot system RAM. I need at least 256mb (Photoshop+Word+Excel+Truespace)
[View Quote]"wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message news:3b71f8d2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Now that I've recieved word that the high school truly IS going to allow laptop computers to any student who wishes to use one,
I'm
> interested in shopping for one. Since it's too short notice to build a full ATX PC into a breifcase (plus that'd be kinda heavy to
> lug around) I guess I'm going to look into buying one. I've decided that I don't need anything particularly fancy, just a 13+ inch
> screen, a CD, floppy and at least 10 gigs of HDD. An A/C adapter is also neccessary (Hah, knowing me the battery would die in the
> middle of somthing important). At least 800MHz of Pentium 3 (Or any AMD mobile CPU) is neccessary. The OS should be Win2k, but if
> it's cheap enough I'll settle for ME or XP.
> 3d graphics a neccessity, doesn't matter what brand so long as it'll do some 3d rendering. A 10/100 ethernet adapter would be nice
> as well, or at least some way to connect it directly to any normal PC (Can you do null modem via USB?) Modem not neccessary.
>
> Carrying weight doesn't matter, but price does. Preferably less than $2000 when all is said and done. If anyone can point me in
the
> general direction of a few companies (I don't care if they're big name so long as they do good work) it would be much appreciated.
>
> BTW, I'm also looking at iBooks, but they're just too fruity in color, so don't tell me about that
>
>
|
Aug 9, 2001, 6:54pm
I'm no ace at news headers, but it would appear that his IP address is the same as the server's (NNTP posting host? It seems unique
for each poster)
[View Quote]"beardo" <beardo at home.se.nospam> wrote in message news:3b72ab6e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> And who are you?
>
> Beardo
>
> "q1" <wiz at rdescape.com> wrote in message news:3b727c29 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Aug 12, 2001, 9:37pm
Wow, this is the second thread in a week meant purely to attack others that provides a list of names. Original Lane. Lets look at
this post in depth, on both a "DUH" and a psychological level.
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3b76f06b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The following are an example of my topic:
>
> Wing, SW Comit, Captain Mad Mike, Chucks Party, and Ryan.
|
So you're gonna talk about us. However, why you put this up front and seperated from the actual message is most likely you wanted US
to respond to it because we'd provide the more entertaining responses, most likely because you think you can "hurt" us. I don't know
about any of the others, but I'm certainly not hurt or affended, I'm just laughing.
> E N Z O makes a (off-topic) post
He's exempt from our rules here, primarily because that was only the FIRST post he made. It's effect was to show us he's just like
the average citizen and that "no concern is too small."
>and you all bitch down like punk ass
> bitches..
Clarify the meaning of "bitch down." Due to the extreme profanity in this part of the opening sentence, it kills off the entire
meaning. However, I'll try to make sense of it. We most certainly did not bite off ENZO's head for it, and we also did not shut up
about it. The lack of posts in the past 24 hours is most likely due to the fact that about two thirds of AW's population was
involved in a ceremony over the course of last night. To my knowledge, you weren't there.
>get a clue..
*coughLAMEcough*
>E N Z O doesn't care about any of you..
He DOESN'T NEED TO! My only concern about him is that he cares about the community. If he doesn't he has little purpose in being a
CEO and will lead AW into the night and destroy it.
>he doesn't
> try to make AW better for anyone..
To use your own word and sentence patterns...
THATS WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO, NUMBNUT!
>Roland (somewhat) tries.. but E N Z O's
> "perfect" staff don't know a needed feature from a pointless one..
Who ever said the staff was perfect? Who ever said the staff made design decisions? Hell, according to information we've recieved
ENZO doesn't make the design decisions anymore, that's JP's department.
> just
> thought it was funny that you idiots punk out when "the big one" posts
> something..
Again, I'm going to make an assumption as to what you mean by "punk out."
Rick has been invisible for a LONG, LONG time. Yesterday's silence was due to the aforementioned event, and before yesterday, for
the most part, was simply shock.
Who died and made you god? BTW, you've now achieved the ranking of überloser in my "book." Congrats on being the first.
Aug 13, 2001, 5:35pm
He'll be gone for a lifetime soon as he gets back a few more times, he'll never stop. Also, Fac, how can we be sure this jackass
doesn't reincarnate himself under different names/citnums?
[View Quote]"andras" <andras at andras.net> wrote in message news:3B7773C2.2B9EE67E at andras.net...
> facter wrote:
>
> Could you extend the banning period for a lifetime for this Lonezeri jerk please???
> Thanks,
> Andras
|
Aug 13, 2001, 5:40pm
Heh, that post's purpose was to simply state my current "emotion" (Somthing you no doubt are desensitized from having) as shock and
speechlessness. It also turned out to be somewhat humorous concerning the lighting command that ENZO had replied to.
Why the hell am I explaining this to you anyway? Enjoy your week off, twitfuck.
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3b782c51$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That wasn't the point.. but E N Z O posted a message and people then replied
> with about 6 or 7 pointless, off-topic posts.
>
> Ex:
> Wing: *blink*
>
> I may be mistaken, but isn't Wing one of the people whom bitch about
> off-topic posts?
>
> "nornny" <Nornny1 at home.com> wrote in message
> news:3b77181a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> as
> doesn't
> O's
>
>
|
Aug 13, 2001, 11:44pm
The xsign still hasn't been fixed, what gives?
Aug 14, 2001, 2:16am
Would it help any if someone from the community created a valid registry for it? Doesn't exactly take a genius to look at an RWX
file and determine it's dimensions, especially one that simple. Just say the word and I'm sure 10 people will jump on it
[View Quote]"facter" <facter at activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3b788933 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
> *sigh* I'm TRYING to get it fixed....
>
> F.
>
> for
> for
> was
> at
>
>
|
Aug 14, 2001, 3:03am
xsign.rwx 1 -295 5 -1 295 395 10
I can't test it though.
[View Quote]"facter" <facter at activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3b788933 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
> *sigh* I'm TRYING to get it fixed....
>
> F.
>
> for
> for
> was
> at
>
>
|
|