|
|
swe // User Search
swe // User Search
Oct 27, 2001, 8:37am
LOL! u think thats a dirty trick!?!?!
AWST Gavroache got roland and e n z o to tell me they wanted to hire me as a
modeler,imagine how embarassed i was when roland asked me about if i ever
saw one of those ads where u phone someone phones a friend of yours lies to
them,and then tells them and they get really angry!
know if i can only find a way of getting back at him!
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3bcd0e06 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> :D Very cool dirty little trick.
> --
> SW Chris
> Eagle Scout, Philosopher, Peacemaker, and... Kung Fu Master?
> http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame1.html
>
> "lady jude" <LadyJude51 at aol.com> wrote in message
> news:3bccfc59$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> this
> the
> should
> range..
> another
whisper
> might
job
> of
made
don't
is
> friends
> is
> don't
while
the
> feel
> would
like
> a
an
>
>
|
Jul 20, 2001, 11:38am
ull need to build,and do if u can make objects then modeling as well if u
want
SWE
[View Quote]"perseus" <theperseus at optushome.com.au> wrote in message
news:3b57f67f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Sure, i dont mind helping, but i errr, wanna know what i would need to be
> doing first
>
>
> "flaggworld002" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b5235c6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> reply
>
>
|
Jul 20, 2001, 11:39am
ur comparing aw,with AOL or Microsoft or Napster??? cant u see the tiny
difrence between them and aw?i mean napster has millions of users,microsofts
OSs are used by almost every computer in the world and made billions of
dollars. AOL is probelly the biggest internet compant in the world,not
including the fact that warner brothers is now part of aol and also made
billions of dollars. and ur compairing it with aw who only have a couple of
thousand users, and hardly made anything compared to those companys! aw is a
small company and thats why they should listen to people if they wanna
become a big one! instead of just doing what they "THINK" people want,or
what only they want. Oh and for ur infomation,when Microsoft make a new OS
they make the things they think there OS needs, and the stuff they get from
feed backs from there users!and aol is a isp,how could u possibly have
problems with that??? and there is nothing that they can do to make aol
better,but they still do! napster already made a whole new browser,based on
user feedbacks,nothing but user feedback
[View Quote]"j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b57bee5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the fact is that AWCI is too large a company to listen to individual
requests.. you don't expect microsoft to listen to your every
> imput.. nor do you expect symantec, aol, napster, the govornment for that
matter.. what makes this any different? The fact that you
> are self rightous and believe your oppinion should dominate their ideals..
and that because they used to be involved, they can still
> be.. Things change, the company has grown exponentially in the past years.
You need to understand that they are evolving, and you
> should be too. The day when the company was small enough that you could
be personal with it's owners is over. It is simply too
> large and too time consuming for AWC to be intimate with every customer, I
doubt they even have the time to be especially close with
> large corporate customers either. The size and magnitude of AWC is far
beyond what first meets the eye. Because the software seems
> like a close-knit type of program, they expect it, they do not understand
how much work is involved to run such a fast growing
> company. I'll admit that it could be more efficient, and could have more
time for the community, but it isn't, and the growing
> amount of extreme requests by citizens doesn't help speed it up either.
What makes this software company so different then others
> that you feel they should pay attention to you. You feel neglected by
other companies and are taking it out on AWC. What makes
> them any different? What makes it that they MUST give the thousands of
citizens their complete devotion, while other, even smaller
> companies, don't have to, and it goes unqeustioned. My ISP has a terms of
service, on the bottom of it they state that they can
> change their TOS at any time without notice or reason. Millions of
customers acknowledge this, and yet continue to use the service.
> You are net getting full attention of the owner of the company, and are
outraged? give me a break!
>
> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B55FF27.D9307D39 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> : That's just it, icey. It doesn't matter what I want AW to be, or what
plans I have
> : for AW. What this is all about is the fact that AWCI isn't *listening*
to our ideas
> : or suggestions, regardless of what they are. Even if it's something as
simple as
> : restoring the old low-res textures, they will completely ignore us and
go about their
> : own ways. *That* is what I'm trying to change with this letter. I'm
hoping to open
> : the channels of communication so that in the future, when the general
public *does*
> : have something they'd like to see changed or implemented, they will know
that their
> : ideas are at least being considered. But until that happens, you can
make all the
> : petitions you want and piss and moan all you want, and it won't make a
lick of
> : difference.
> :
> : icey wrote:
> : >
> : > Yes, but what are your objectives, what are your goals, what are you
going to conceive to
> : > improve AW, are you going to implement programs, programming, design,
applications, are
> : > you going to find a new way to build or maybe a different approach to
the 3D or are you
> : > just concerned in already built areas and collaborative virtual
environments, you want AW
> : > to be a toy, the internet game, a fun chat, a free software...what in
particular would
> : > you like to do...I don't understand...
> : > icey
> : > goober king wrote:
> : >
> : > > An olive branch, for all intents and purposes. The time for bashing
and name-calling
> : > > is over. Now is a time of communication and action. I'm willing to
work together with
> : > > these people to help make AW a better place, as are the people
who've signed this
> : > > letter. Are you?
> : > >
> : > > icey wrote:
> : > > >
> : > > > What do you offer?
> : > > >
> : > > > goober king wrote:
> : > > >
> : > > > > To Whom It May Concern...
> : > > > >
> : > >
> : > > <snip>
> :
> : --
> : Goober King
> : Solve the main problem, and all other solutions will follow...
> : rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
>
>
|
Jul 20, 2001, 10:05pm
we dont want them to spend time with us! we want them to listen to our
ideas,and do the good ones!
[View Quote]"j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b58a5c9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that isn't the point.. it is a company just like all others..
> AWCom has 100s of uniserver customers and corporate customers, with more
being consulted daily, and you seem to think that they
> should spend every waking hour with us. They can't afford to, they have
to have larger customers, that is where they make profit,
> so that is where they will pay their attention.
>
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b583476 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> : ur comparing aw,with AOL or Microsoft or Napster??? cant u see the tiny
> : difrence between them and aw?i mean napster has millions of
users,microsofts
> : OSs are used by almost every computer in the world and made billions of
> : dollars. AOL is probelly the biggest internet compant in the world,not
> : including the fact that warner brothers is now part of aol and also made
> : billions of dollars. and ur compairing it with aw who only have a couple
of
> : thousand users, and hardly made anything compared to those companys! aw
is a
> : small company and thats why they should listen to people if they wanna
> : become a big one! instead of just doing what they "THINK" people want,or
> : what only they want. Oh and for ur infomation,when Microsoft make a new
OS
> : they make the things they think there OS needs, and the stuff they get
from
> : feed backs from there users!and aol is a isp,how could u possibly have
> : problems with that??? and there is nothing that they can do to make aol
> : better,but they still do! napster already made a whole new browser,based
on
> : user feedbacks,nothing but user feedback
> :
> : "j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message
> : news:3b57bee5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> : > the fact is that AWCI is too large a company to listen to individual
> : requests.. you don't expect microsoft to listen to your every
> : > imput.. nor do you expect symantec, aol, napster, the govornment for
that
> : matter.. what makes this any different? The fact that you
> : > are self rightous and believe your oppinion should dominate their
ideals..
> : and that because they used to be involved, they can still
> : > be.. Things change, the company has grown exponentially in the past
years.
> : You need to understand that they are evolving, and you
> : > should be too. The day when the company was small enough that you
could
> : be personal with it's owners is over. It is simply too
> : > large and too time consuming for AWC to be intimate with every
customer, I
> : doubt they even have the time to be especially close with
> : > large corporate customers either. The size and magnitude of AWC is
far
> : beyond what first meets the eye. Because the software seems
> : > like a close-knit type of program, they expect it, they do not
understand
> : how much work is involved to run such a fast growing
> : > company. I'll admit that it could be more efficient, and could have
more
> : time for the community, but it isn't, and the growing
> : > amount of extreme requests by citizens doesn't help speed it up
either.
> : What makes this software company so different then others
> : > that you feel they should pay attention to you. You feel neglected by
> : other companies and are taking it out on AWC. What makes
> : > them any different? What makes it that they MUST give the thousands of
> : citizens their complete devotion, while other, even smaller
> : > companies, don't have to, and it goes unqeustioned. My ISP has a
terms of
> : service, on the bottom of it they state that they can
> : > change their TOS at any time without notice or reason. Millions of
> : customers acknowledge this, and yet continue to use the service.
> : > You are net getting full attention of the owner of the company, and
are
> : outraged? give me a break!
> : >
> : > "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> : news:3B55FF27.D9307D39 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> : > : That's just it, icey. It doesn't matter what I want AW to be, or
what
> : plans I have
> : > : for AW. What this is all about is the fact that AWCI isn't
*listening*
> : to our ideas
> : > : or suggestions, regardless of what they are. Even if it's something
as
> : simple as
> : > : restoring the old low-res textures, they will completely ignore us
and
> : go about their
> : > : own ways. *That* is what I'm trying to change with this letter. I'm
> : hoping to open
> : > : the channels of communication so that in the future, when the
general
> : public *does*
> : > : have something they'd like to see changed or implemented, they will
know
> : that their
> : > : ideas are at least being considered. But until that happens, you can
> : make all the
> : > : petitions you want and piss and moan all you want, and it won't make
a
> : lick of
> : > : difference.
> : > :
> : > : icey wrote:
> : > : >
> : > : > Yes, but what are your objectives, what are your goals, what are
you
> : going to conceive to
> : > : > improve AW, are you going to implement programs, programming,
design,
> : applications, are
> : > : > you going to find a new way to build or maybe a different approach
to
> : the 3D or are you
> : > : > just concerned in already built areas and collaborative virtual
> : environments, you want AW
> : > : > to be a toy, the internet game, a fun chat, a free software...what
in
> : particular would
> : > : > you like to do...I don't understand...
> : > : > icey
> : > : > goober king wrote:
> : > : >
> : > : > > An olive branch, for all intents and purposes. The time for
bashing
> : and name-calling
> : > : > > is over. Now is a time of communication and action. I'm willing
to
> : work together with
> : > : > > these people to help make AW a better place, as are the people
> : who've signed this
> : > : > > letter. Are you?
> : > : > >
> : > : > > icey wrote:
> : > : > > >
> : > : > > > What do you offer?
> : > : > > >
> : > : > > > goober king wrote:
> : > : > > >
> : > : > > > > To Whom It May Concern...
> : > : > > > >
> : > : > >
> : > : > > <snip>
> : > :
> : > : --
> : > : Goober King
> : > : Solve the main problem, and all other solutions will follow...
> : > : rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
> : >
> : >
> :
> :
>
>
|
Jul 20, 2001, 10:07pm
oh and another thing is that aol and microsoft anf other suchcompanys have
physcologists whos understand the way people think,and expers who read
feedbacks and do what ever is the best idea
[View Quote]"j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b58a5c9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that isn't the point.. it is a company just like all others..
> AWCom has 100s of uniserver customers and corporate customers, with more
being consulted daily, and you seem to think that they
> should spend every waking hour with us. They can't afford to, they have
to have larger customers, that is where they make profit,
> so that is where they will pay their attention.
>
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b583476 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> : ur comparing aw,with AOL or Microsoft or Napster??? cant u see the tiny
> : difrence between them and aw?i mean napster has millions of
users,microsofts
> : OSs are used by almost every computer in the world and made billions of
> : dollars. AOL is probelly the biggest internet compant in the world,not
> : including the fact that warner brothers is now part of aol and also made
> : billions of dollars. and ur compairing it with aw who only have a couple
of
> : thousand users, and hardly made anything compared to those companys! aw
is a
> : small company and thats why they should listen to people if they wanna
> : become a big one! instead of just doing what they "THINK" people want,or
> : what only they want. Oh and for ur infomation,when Microsoft make a new
OS
> : they make the things they think there OS needs, and the stuff they get
from
> : feed backs from there users!and aol is a isp,how could u possibly have
> : problems with that??? and there is nothing that they can do to make aol
> : better,but they still do! napster already made a whole new browser,based
on
> : user feedbacks,nothing but user feedback
> :
> : "j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message
> : news:3b57bee5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> : > the fact is that AWCI is too large a company to listen to individual
> : requests.. you don't expect microsoft to listen to your every
> : > imput.. nor do you expect symantec, aol, napster, the govornment for
that
> : matter.. what makes this any different? The fact that you
> : > are self rightous and believe your oppinion should dominate their
ideals..
> : and that because they used to be involved, they can still
> : > be.. Things change, the company has grown exponentially in the past
years.
> : You need to understand that they are evolving, and you
> : > should be too. The day when the company was small enough that you
could
> : be personal with it's owners is over. It is simply too
> : > large and too time consuming for AWC to be intimate with every
customer, I
> : doubt they even have the time to be especially close with
> : > large corporate customers either. The size and magnitude of AWC is
far
> : beyond what first meets the eye. Because the software seems
> : > like a close-knit type of program, they expect it, they do not
understand
> : how much work is involved to run such a fast growing
> : > company. I'll admit that it could be more efficient, and could have
more
> : time for the community, but it isn't, and the growing
> : > amount of extreme requests by citizens doesn't help speed it up
either.
> : What makes this software company so different then others
> : > that you feel they should pay attention to you. You feel neglected by
> : other companies and are taking it out on AWC. What makes
> : > them any different? What makes it that they MUST give the thousands of
> : citizens their complete devotion, while other, even smaller
> : > companies, don't have to, and it goes unqeustioned. My ISP has a
terms of
> : service, on the bottom of it they state that they can
> : > change their TOS at any time without notice or reason. Millions of
> : customers acknowledge this, and yet continue to use the service.
> : > You are net getting full attention of the owner of the company, and
are
> : outraged? give me a break!
> : >
> : > "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> : news:3B55FF27.D9307D39 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> : > : That's just it, icey. It doesn't matter what I want AW to be, or
what
> : plans I have
> : > : for AW. What this is all about is the fact that AWCI isn't
*listening*
> : to our ideas
> : > : or suggestions, regardless of what they are. Even if it's something
as
> : simple as
> : > : restoring the old low-res textures, they will completely ignore us
and
> : go about their
> : > : own ways. *That* is what I'm trying to change with this letter. I'm
> : hoping to open
> : > : the channels of communication so that in the future, when the
general
> : public *does*
> : > : have something they'd like to see changed or implemented, they will
know
> : that their
> : > : ideas are at least being considered. But until that happens, you can
> : make all the
> : > : petitions you want and piss and moan all you want, and it won't make
a
> : lick of
> : > : difference.
> : > :
> : > : icey wrote:
> : > : >
> : > : > Yes, but what are your objectives, what are your goals, what are
you
> : going to conceive to
> : > : > improve AW, are you going to implement programs, programming,
design,
> : applications, are
> : > : > you going to find a new way to build or maybe a different approach
to
> : the 3D or are you
> : > : > just concerned in already built areas and collaborative virtual
> : environments, you want AW
> : > : > to be a toy, the internet game, a fun chat, a free software...what
in
> : particular would
> : > : > you like to do...I don't understand...
> : > : > icey
> : > : > goober king wrote:
> : > : >
> : > : > > An olive branch, for all intents and purposes. The time for
bashing
> : and name-calling
> : > : > > is over. Now is a time of communication and action. I'm willing
to
> : work together with
> : > : > > these people to help make AW a better place, as are the people
> : who've signed this
> : > : > > letter. Are you?
> : > : > >
> : > : > > icey wrote:
> : > : > > >
> : > : > > > What do you offer?
> : > : > > >
> : > : > > > goober king wrote:
> : > : > > >
> : > : > > > > To Whom It May Concern...
> : > : > > > >
> : > : > >
> : > : > > <snip>
> : > :
> : > : --
> : > : Goober King
> : > : Solve the main problem, and all other solutions will follow...
> : > : rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
> : >
> : >
> :
> :
>
>
|
Jul 22, 2001, 11:00pm
try cuteftp,thats probelly the best,and it supports all kind of
things,including resume,goto www.download.com and download a demo
SWE
[View Quote]"imagine" <imagines at seatac.net> wrote in message
news:3b5a6f03 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi :)
> Does anyone know if there is an ftp with a resume option?
> If not, would it be at all possible for one of you nice programmers out
> there
> in AW land to PLEEEEEEEEEEES make an ftp with a resume on it, for those of
> us with dial up and can't stay connected long enough to upload a large
file
> after trying for 2 days?
> Just wondering :)
>
> Imagine
>
>
>
|
Jul 24, 2001, 2:09pm
i had a cuteftp crack,and no server rejected it,iut worked ajust as
good,only thing is i cant find it,after my computer was formated
[View Quote]"jerme" <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3b5bcb47 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> CuteFTP is by far the best FTP client I've ever seen... I would recommend
it
> over any other. It has the resume feature (look for it in the options),
and
> many many more. I did have a crack for this...but lost it in a
> reformat/reinstall. Lately I tried to download it again, along with a
crack
> (try http://www.crackz.ws/) However, GlobeScape has since added server
auth
> to the software. No matter what I tried...server always rejected the
> crack... Good luck, and let me know if you get it too work.
>
> I'm working on setting up a server (look for it to be online within the
next
> 1- 1 1/2 weeks) and thus I have looked into FTP software. John Viper is
> right... You have to have a decent piece of server software... Not all of
it
> is capable of using the resume uploads feature.
>
>
> "imagine" <imagines at seatac.net> wrote in message
> news:3b5a6f03 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
of
> file
>
>
|
Jul 24, 2001, 8:03pm
LOL!!!! what a nice way to get like $100 dollars of with a $20 cit u got
with a world!!!! LOL! i gotta try that one day!
[View Quote]"gamer" <Robbie at AWlife.net> wrote in message
news:3b5d5faa at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Adras is Currently winning with the page she submitted with a Geforece 2
MX
> 400 (as requested) for $70!!!!
>
> $14.95 shipping so thats....
>
> $84.95
>
> C'mon people! you can beat that :o)
>
>
|
Jul 25, 2001, 11:15am
AW is coded to freakin not allow 2 browsers at the same time! if it isnt
edited its impossible! and if it only duplicated the stuff u need,u can
install AW twice and it would work the same!
SWE
[View Quote]"mike zimmer" <zimmer at pitnet.net> wrote in message
news:3b5e3c6d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> http://www.awteen.homestead.com/files/2AW.jpg
>
> and the program I used to do it:
> http://www.awteen.homestead.com/files/cloner.jpg
>
> need I type more?
>
> agent1 <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3b5e28ef$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> news:3b5e26e8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
the
> once
it
legal
> :-)
>
>
|
Jul 26, 2001, 12:01am
well then how cme u cant get AW and OW or VS to work at the same time?
[View Quote]"mike zimmer" <zimmer at pitnet.net> wrote in message
news:3b5f1d08$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Therefore, it is not running on the SAME files that my other AW browser
is,
> so I can open two at once.
>
> mike zimmer <zimmer at pitnet.net> wrote in message
> news:3b5f1ca5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> it!
it
> once.
more
>
>
|
Jul 26, 2001, 12:04am
u mgiht not know it,but for sure it changes the code,might change it with
out u knowing,but it does,it has to,so stop saying it doesnt,it cant just
duplicate the files,wont work,never
[View Quote]"rypp" <rypp at fna.no> wrote in message
news:3b5d69ea$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Long time ago i downloaded a file named aworld1.exe from the Outerworlds
> Dungeon world. This file made me start the Activeworlds browser twice on
my
> computer. Does anybody know if there is an upgraded version of the
> aworld1.exe file somewhere out there? A file that works with AW 3.1?
> Please let me know if you know where to download the file. :-)
>
> rypp
>
>
|
Jul 24, 2001, 5:24pm
just for ur info,ive seen a skybox with 3.1 before,in a world,cant remeber
where thou
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b5da5a6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> uh... ever tought about thinking? if it's there now, how come it only
comes
> in 3.2? off course it isn't!
>
> KAH
>
> "andvar" <andresvargas at net-uno.net> wrote in message
> news:3b5d8e5e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jul 24, 2001, 10:48pm
well accully it was,it was like a semi-shpere,and its like im always in
it,no matter how far i go
[View Quote]"agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b5dd6b8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> It's not the same as will be implemented in 3.2.
>
> -Agent1
>
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b5dcb5f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
remeber where thou
comes
>
>
|
Jul 24, 2001, 2:18pm
ok,im i the only one to relise that some people will complain about
anything?i mean goober kings was good,but others r complaining bout anything
they can find wrong,anything at all,just to get attention or to start up
something or whatever! if u dont have something proper to complain bout,then
shut up!
Flash Guy ( aka SWE )
Jul 24, 2001, 5:21pm
what im talking bout is stuff like harry poters post about there not being
enough objects in aw,i mean there r more then enough if u go looking in the
object yard,and also people complaining bout other stuff ouitside aw,thats
just dumb
[View Quote]"nornny" <Nornny1 at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b5daea3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Are you complaining about the complaining in the newsgroup? lol Sounds
kinda
> hypocritical.
>
> Just ignore it. If you have ANY decent experience in this newsgroup, you'd
> know that these guys DO complain about everything, somehow, it turns out
> productive most of the time (gets ppl thinking and hey, you gotta open up
> the door somewhere).
>
> You can really tell who's complaining for attention and who is for the
sake
> of complaining, however. The simplest solution to the complaining is just
> ignore it, leave, or look at it from another window. it's the only way
> you'll ever accept this newsgroup for anything other than a trash pile.
> Besides, it's not going to stop. You wouldn't have a newsgroup if it did.
>
> Nornny
>
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b5d9fe8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> anything
> bout,then
>
>
|
Jul 24, 2001, 10:37pm
well the only objects u can add r the ones u can make with out them being
one object,thats all,and maybe some cars and planes,but nothign else,they
got everything
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b5de499 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> well, you could add quite a few ones to enhance the AW experience (mostly
> variations on allready existing objects)
>
> KAH
>
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b5dcaca at server1.Activeworlds.com...
being
> the
aw,thats
> you'd
out
> up
> just
pile.
> did.
start
> up
>
>
|
Jul 24, 2001, 10:37pm
what r u talking bout? in the world AW?if so wasnt there always free public
building?
if ur talking bout something else and im the only one who doesnt understand
can someone please expliain it to me?
[View Quote]"facter" <"Facter at AWsupport"> wrote in message
news:3b5de40c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Free public building outside of the 50 nsew zone has been re-instated.
>
> --
> Facter
> Active Worlds Support
> Activeworlds.com
> support at activeworlds.com
>
>
|
Jul 25, 2001, 11:09am
Ohhhh,so thats what the subject ment! well he could have said in
Pollen,because i dont know about you guys, but i dont instantly know what
world every aw employee owns!
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b5e14e7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> what r u talking bout? in the world AW?if so wasnt there always free
public
> building?
> if ur talking bout something else and im the only one who doesnt
understand
> can someone please expliain it to me?
> "facter" <"Facter at AWsupport"> wrote in message
> news:3b5de40c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jul 25, 2001, 11:57pm
epp for fuk sakes do us all a favour and stop with the insults on the NG. it
doesnt make anyone think ull cool or shit,justs makes everyone relise how
immature someone ur age can be! so if u dont have something which doesnt
insult everyperson who ever used the NG to say,then just sit down and shut
up!
SWE [ no hard feelings :) ]
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B5F6657.27C0790A at tnlc.com...
> <shrug> I wasn't. YOU need to start taking things more seriously and get
out of the little box you live in.
>
> facter wrote:
>
news:3B5E4E77.11A5E4BC at tnlc.com...
all
>
|
Jul 25, 2001, 11:58pm
say what? give up bout what?
[View Quote]"mike zimmer" <zimmer at pitnet.net> wrote in message
news:3b5f1ca2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Give up while you're ahead, if you are that is :-)
>
> swe <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b5ec504 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
what
re-instated.
>
>
|
Jul 26, 2001, 1:36am
lol, k
[View Quote]"mike zimmer" <zimmer at pitnet.net> wrote in message
news:3b5f7dac at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Nevermind, airplane joke.
>
> swe <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b5f7955 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
free
>
>
|
Jul 26, 2001, 8:13pm
well i dont bother to check my spelling before i write something! so just do
nearly everyone a favour and get the fuck away from aw!get the fuck away
from any thing to do with aw and the net for that matter! tell me how does
it feel to know that everyone in AW thinks ur the biggest bitch of all
times? bet thats why u try to build a cool world and swear alot on the NG.
and the fact that the only cool thing bout ur world is the sound and
shadow(whichs isnt so great) u must be a very depresed person! so go fuck ur
self.
SWE
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B5FD6D8.A3B9F8AC at tnlc.com...
> <chuckle> This from a twit who can't even spell/type correctly. Drive
through, lamer.
>
> swe wrote:
>
NG. it
how
shut
get
>
|
Jul 26, 2001, 8:19pm
well to almost everyone in this news group ur the one whos sick in the
head,dumb dull person with no friends! and do u say anything other then
<shrugs> in the begining of every reply of urs?ur nothing but a sad pathetic
twit,and u gotta live with that,so u try insulting other people. bet ur the
ugly type,that no one likes,who has no firends,nerdy and still fails
everything and and arent better in anythign,so u try to get good in
building in aw. well go live ur pathetic life by ur self. and if u wanna
bitch,go bitch somewhere else!
SWE
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B5FD7A7.783BF30 at tnlc.com...
> <shrug> Not my fault some people are weak. :) Ever heard the expression
"laughter is the best medicine"? Think about it: if you need to make jokes
about things a lot you might be sick in the head a bit (humor has been known
to alleviate pain)...
>
> wing wrote:
>
humor even under the most serious circumstances.
get out of the little box you live in.
model
>
|
Jul 27, 2001, 1:46am
I mean arent good in anything,so u try to become a good builder in aw
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b609764 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> well to almost everyone in this news group ur the one whos sick in the
> head,dumb dull person with no friends! and do u say anything other then
> <shrugs> in the begining of every reply of urs?ur nothing but a sad
pathetic
> twit,and u gotta live with that,so u try insulting other people. bet ur
the
> ugly type,that no one likes,who has no firends,nerdy and still fails
> everything and and arent better in anythign,so u try to get good in
> building in aw. well go live ur pathetic life by ur self. and if u wanna
> bitch,go bitch somewhere else!
>
> SWE
> "eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B5FD7A7.783BF30 at tnlc.com...
> "laughter is the best medicine"? Think about it: if you need to make jokes
> about things a lot you might be sick in the head a bit (humor has been
known
> to alleviate pain)...
of
> humor even under the most serious circumstances.
news:3B5F6657.27C0790A at tnlc.com...
> get out of the little box you live in.
> model
>
>
|
Jul 27, 2001, 1:48pm
Oh,well someone in the NG said SHE bout u,so i assumed ur female, well the
fact that u seem to enjoy swearing at everyone, thinking ur some kinda
powrful popular person is what makes u the biggest twit! if someone said
something bout u then ya sure,swear back,but u swearing and insulting anyone
who says anything u dont like is fucked up,and that makes u a asshole
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B61076E.7B98E8BC at tnlc.com...
> <chuckle> I try to build a cool world and swear a lot in the newsgroups
because everyone in AW thinks I'm the biggest bitch (er, I'm not female, by
the way) of all times? <blink> I don't see the logic there... I continue
being who I am because I have a high enough self-esteem, and feel
passionately enough about what I'm doing, that I CAN continue to act with
conviction in the face of seemingly overwhelming opposition. <shrug>
>
> swe wrote:
>
just do
does
NG.
fuck ur
the
relise
doesnt
and
news:3B5F6657.27C0790A at tnlc.com...
and
>
|
Jul 26, 2001, 1:33am
well program is when u make the accule program,scripting is when u script
something for a program,like vb ull be making programs,HTML ull be scripting
for IE or netscape or whatever
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b5f3cb4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I have a Q: for people who would like to answer it.. I'm not sure what NG
> it should be in.. maybe SDK or Bots.. but who knows..
>
> Q1: What is the diff between Programming languages and Scripting
languages?
>
> Q2:
>
> VB, C++, Delphi.. them are Programming languages, correct?
>
> HTML, Java, and RWX are Scripting languages, right?
>
> Purpose for this post:
> I was in AD&DRPG with a friend and I said the bot sucked because of how it
> repeated "[DM Guard]: has been ejected for 10 minutes (Flooding)" over
and
> over.. and someone said VB was to blame for it, so I said it wasn't the
> language it was the bad programming and then he said something about how I
> wasn't a good programmer since he hasn't heard of me.. big argument..
seems
> he knew didn't know many people I mentioned.. anyhow.. he tried to tell me
> RWX was a programming language.. I'm not a genius but doesn't the word
> "program" mean something in the word Programming meaning it is not a
> programming language since it isn't a program.. it would be a scripting
> language correct? Sorry for the useless post..
>
>
|
Jul 27, 2001, 1:56am
Finally, someone who knows what they are talking bout :)
SWE(ya i know i replyed to lanzerinies post,and that im saying i didnt
know how to explain it)
[View Quote]"faber" <Walter at Knupe.de> wrote in message
news:3b605f0c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "Programming Language" is a generic term that includes all languages that
enable you
> to write down a set of instructions to execute. This includes C++, VB,
Delphi, Java, JavaScript,
> VBScript, Perl, Cobol, SmallTalk, Assembler, Pascal, ADA, BCPL, i think
PHP, C#, etc, etc.
>
> "Scripting Language" is a subset of "Programming Language" which applies
to languages
> which are directly interpreted from their source form and not transformed
into a machine-
> readable equivalent prior to execution. This is the case for JavaScript,
VBScript, Perl
> IN GENERAL. However, there are for example JavaScript compilers around.
> Note the original BASIC was a scripting language, while these days its
not.
>
> "Descriptive Languages" are languages that only contain data. They need a
program that derives
> a description, a meaning from it, and they do not contain executable code.
> HTML, PostScript, Tex, XML and RWX are examples of that kind of language.
>
> Those are general rules, of course, and reality usually does not
distuingish as clearly. HTML is
> known to be able to carry around code as well in form of JavaScript or
VBScript. And i think
> Postscript is capable of containing executable code as well.
>
> And even scripting languages could, in theory, have a just-in-time
compiler to speed things up, but
> that usually only applies to byte-code (or pseudo-code) form, as the case
with Java or with all
> the managed code languages from .net (which is VB, C# and Managed C++).
>
> Faber
>
> "lanezeri" <Lanezeri at yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3b5f3cb4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
NG
languages?
it
and
I
seems
me
>
|
Jul 27, 2001, 2:01am
oh wait,enerv mind,never read the last bit,there is no wat,HTML or RWX is a
programing language,thats a scripting language since it isnt run by its
self,by buy another program,such as Internet explorer and AW
[View Quote]"faber" <Walter at Knupe.de> wrote in message
news:3b605f0c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "Programming Language" is a generic term that includes all languages that
enable you
> to write down a set of instructions to execute. This includes C++, VB,
Delphi, Java, JavaScript,
> VBScript, Perl, Cobol, SmallTalk, Assembler, Pascal, ADA, BCPL, i think
PHP, C#, etc, etc.
>
> "Scripting Language" is a subset of "Programming Language" which applies
to languages
> which are directly interpreted from their source form and not transformed
into a machine-
> readable equivalent prior to execution. This is the case for JavaScript,
VBScript, Perl
> IN GENERAL. However, there are for example JavaScript compilers around.
> Note the original BASIC was a scripting language, while these days its
not.
>
> "Descriptive Languages" are languages that only contain data. They need a
program that derives
> a description, a meaning from it, and they do not contain executable code.
> HTML, PostScript, Tex, XML and RWX are examples of that kind of language.
>
> Those are general rules, of course, and reality usually does not
distuingish as clearly. HTML is
> known to be able to carry around code as well in form of JavaScript or
VBScript. And i think
> Postscript is capable of containing executable code as well.
>
> And even scripting languages could, in theory, have a just-in-time
compiler to speed things up, but
> that usually only applies to byte-code (or pseudo-code) form, as the case
with Java or with all
> the managed code languages from .net (which is VB, C# and Managed C++).
>
> Faber
>
> "lanezeri" <Lanezeri at yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3b5f3cb4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
NG
languages?
it
and
I
seems
me
>
|
Jul 27, 2001, 1:48pm
lol,sorry bout the spelling,write like that when im sleppy,what i ment was
never mind,html and RWX are kinda scripting language,and no way programing
languages,since u script them for another program,and arent stand alone.
Well RWX i ant sure if its a scripting or something else,but HTML is
definatly a scripting language,not programing
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b6171a5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> huh??? it's ok not to check spelling, but I really couldn't understand
that
> last part... RWX is not a scripting language, that is just some BS that
> Criterion came up with... RWX is simply a 3D file format. HTML is not a
> programming language, it's called Hyper Text Markup Language it was meant
to
> make text look pretty...
>
> KAH
>
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b60e7ae$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
is
> a
> that
think
applies
> transformed
> JavaScript,
around.
need
> a
> code.
> language.
> case
C++).
> what
> how
> over
> the
> how
argument..
> tell
word
> scripting
>
>
|
Jul 26, 2001, 8:13pm
hey yall,i need people to make textures for a certian project im working
on,if anyone would like to voleenteer,please tgram me via AW(citname SWE) or
reply to this post. a Tgram would be alot better
SWE(327320)
|
