|
|
silenced // User Search
silenced // User Search
May 25, 2002, 1:42pm
Sorry didn't see you already added it.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3cefb0a6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That'd be nice, I'd like that. Would you do that please? Just for an
> advanced warning that stuff may not be suitable for certain people.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> Have $3... want a website?
> http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
>
> "anduin" <anduin at anduin-lothario.com> wrote in message
> news:g14veukjnjfma7c18i8mgt7u7bakmhrp75 at 4ax.com...
newsgroup
> at
>
>
|
May 26, 2002, 10:44am
Still, not all children are breast fed now-a-days.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"chickengurl" <no at spam.ty> wrote in message
news:3cf0cd66$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Knowing you remember isn't the case. It's all there subconsciously, wether
> you know you remember or not. All the things a baby hears, sees, feels,
> tastes, smells is chizzled in to memory, because those very things are
what
> stimulates it's mind to grow..
>
> "zeo toxion" <zeo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3cf0153a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
their
I've
in
>
>
|
May 26, 2002, 12:45pm
It's a long complicated idea, just drop it, he put up a little thingie and
that's ok. The fact of the matter is that it was in the Slave section.
That coupled with the nude women could damage a childs mind in a number of
ways. But it doesn't matter anymore.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"chickengurl" <no at spam.ty> wrote in message
news:3cf0e9d2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That's not the point. The point is there are no reports of people being
> emotionally or psychologically scarred directly by being breast fed.
Seeing
> humans nude is some thing you get used to really quickly if you aren't
> constantly sheltered from reality and told it's wrong.
> Do you know of any people who have problems today because they saw simple
> nudity when they were brought up to believe it's natural?
>
> How old of children are you talking about here? All of the 4 year and
older
> people I know can differentiate reality from video games or cartoons
(Unless
> they have some type of mental problem) easily.
>
> Then the next question is, what self-respecting parent or guardian would
> allow a child (their soul responsibility) to access a place such as the
> internet, if they disagreed with the moral values of even one person that
> used it? Free information comes with the price of tolerance, and that's
some
> thing children have more of than adults in most cases.
>
> Can you elaborate your opinion more clearly? How exactly will the pictures
> bring harm to some one?
> Honestly, maybe I'm just too dumb (It's happened plenty of times before)
to
> understand what you're saying here.
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cf0d8bd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> ---- clip clip -----
>
>
|
May 26, 2002, 4:53pm
Hah so glad I removed you from my killfile. Niavity is the worse thing you
could get. Unlike you, Anduin is a nice guy. I'm not 16 either, genius.
Still "shitting in one hand and making compliants in the other"?
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"bodhitah" <bodhitah at earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3cf12842 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Anduin,
>
> You do not have to change your signature nor do you have to add that
> distracting pop-up to your site (which I see is already up). Just because
> some 16 year old geek thinks its offensive. Any "kid" old enough and smart
> enough to start a computer and navigate a newsgroup has seen TITS before.
> Get a life Bowen.
>
>
|
May 26, 2002, 7:11pm
Sorry wasn't exactly awake yet. My question is, can you learn grammar
correctly? Moron!
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"bodhitah" <bodhitah at earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3cf13483$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The 16 year old geek remark was a generality...But you seem to think it
was
> aimed at you..so be it.
>
> I do know Anduin very well and he is a nice guy.
>
> btw are you ever going to learn to spell ? It helps your lame attempts at
> flaming people if your flames are spelled correctly. Moron !
>
>
>
|
May 28, 2002, 9:31am
He responded to a one from 2002. You must need to clear your news server
cache if you're seeing 1999.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"carlbanks" <Virtualcarlbanks at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3cf2f20b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Please don't post in a posting from 1999.
>
> "a1cttourist5" <pineriver at thenett.com> wrote in message
> news:3cf2efa3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
May 28, 2002, 5:12pm
Well, there's no real point.
--Bowen--
Have $3... want a website?
http://www.smartpenguin.com/affiliate.php?id=12
[View Quote]"carlbanks" <Virtualcarlbanks at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3cf36c8a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> But then I can't read the old postings
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3cf36a86$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
server
> to
scribed
>
>
|
Feb 9, 2002, 6:26pm
suprising isn't it
-silenced
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chris at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message
news:3c65843e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> funny, I don't remember that particular conversation...
>
> SW Chris
>
> "filmkr" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3C64BA2F.109996A8 at privacy.com...
you
> negligent
responses
> was
rendered
graphics
Stupid
but
no
dont
a
>
>
|
Feb 10, 2002, 12:05am
hah I'm not him, just copying his email
-silenced
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chris at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message
news:3c65d396 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well I do wonder where I was. :) If double billing was all your post was
> about, I would have backed you.
>
> SW Chris
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3c65860d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
cost
like
> feel
> keep
> number
the
Yea,
> I
cit..
> is
cascade
> for..
>
>
|
Feb 11, 2002, 12:10am
paying for land is a stupid idea. you already pay for it with a cit, if you
do not get it what's the point of buying a cit in the first place.. visiting
worlds is not worth the price we are going to pay. I do not understand what
this object compiler is just right click on an object, and change their name
and it's a different object. time limits are another thing people hate.
builders don't like to be forced to pump out buildings in a limited time,
creativity doesn't work on a timeline.
it's hard to understand what you are trying to convey to us, it is too
abstract for me anymore. I certainly would not pay for any of this. no
offense.
-silenced
[View Quote]"pc hamster" <pchamster at email.msn.com> wrote in message
news:3c67215c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi everyone
>
> I hinted on the group list last night that I had an alternative idea to 3D
> Homepages, and after some much needed rest in the wake of my "trip", I'm
now
> posting my deas here. Feel free to comment on them if you wish.
>
> I was passing some WONDERFUL (and not-so-wonderful) builds as I raced back
> ON FOOT from about 24,000 N 24,000 W all the way abck to GZ (took me a
> little over 24 hours to do it though), I began to wonder WHY is
ActiveWorlds
> charging for 3D Homeages (which have *very little* #D functionality) when
in
> fact they could *easily* (and more feasibly) charge for space on
AlphaWorld
> instead???? I mean, they've only *begun* to fill in the space there!!!
How
> can they afford to just simply let all that land simply go to waste????
> It's beyond me....
>
> Now hear me out on this, okay.....
>
> Granted there are works of art on there and some builds which you wonder
why
> they even exist at all. However, I believe that some pre-set guidelines
> will cure that.
>
> Once a person gets the space, they get all the objects and building tools
> currently afforded to 3D Homepage Owners. In addition to that, we would
> have access to the AlphaWorld Building Yard as well as an object compiler
> (to make the moving of duplicated objects easier). We could build on as
> mcuh (or as little) of the space as possible (up to a P-10). Plus, they
> would all be inter-connected via the roadways on Alpha World so one can
just
> simply go from town to town just like driving out in the country.
>
> Speaking of driving, see my post script at the end of this message.....
>
> However though, here are some suggested guidelines.....
>
> Any bulding MUST be COMPLETELY built (and furnished!). No incomplete
> structures will be allowed or they will be deleted within a certain length
> of time not to exceed 30 calendar days. We would also have 10 calendar
days
> to AT LEAST begin with construction, though any space left under
> construction for six months would be re-allocated to someone else and all
> objects imported would be deleted.
>
> We would get all this for the current price of $6.95
>
> Hypertext links could be changed whereas instead of going to some 3D
> Homepage, surfers are taken to wherever GZ used to be in the 3D Homepage
> (post 3D Homepage applicants wouldn't need to know this though because
they
> never had a 3D Homepage before).
>
> Finally, to match all the particular themes out there, I think the current
> AlphaWorld could easily be rendered suitable for all current 3D Homepage
> themes except for Atlantis (these owners would fall into a new Alpha world
> called Aw-Atlantis or something like that). Seperate Alpha worlds can
later
> be created to better match the theme.
>
> So guys, have I gone totally beserk or am I on to something????
>
> Your tuen to comment....Cheers... :-)
>
> Patrick Cook
> Owner - Hamsterville (as known in the Immigration Officer greeting - Pub
> 102X otherwise)
> pchamster at msn.com
> Denver, Colorado
>
> P.S.: Is there some reason why there isn't a CAR in the Avatars pull-down
> menu on AlphaWorld???? I mean if AlphaWorld is going to be made into a
near
> replica of America's fascination with roads, we ought to at least have the
|
> option of being a car as we drive down the roads. Can AW answer this
one???
> If no one does, I bring it up when I take up some others matters with AW.
> In the meantime Cheers....Patrick :-)
>
>
Feb 12, 2002, 9:42pm
>
> Then how is it I am able to get on without any problem at all????
Stellar,
> did you add anybody to the list or is it now a public world????
Privately owned. Not private as in red dotted. All green worlds are open
to all. If it's restricted it'll still be red even if you have enter.
I don't have any comment on the rest of the stuff.. :)
-silenced
Feb 18, 2002, 8:12pm
Uh.. that's easy to get around such as taking the texture name and putting
it there with .jpg.
such as myhost.com/op/textures/this.jpg
No matter how much protection you have, that'll still be accessible if it's
accessible in AW.
-silenced
[View Quote]"zeo toxion" <b.nolan2 at verizon.net> wrote in message
news:3c715cd3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> actually he said directories which means people cant view the list from
the
> web...although thats pretty easy just by putting an index.html in there
>
> "moff piett" <baronjutter at shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:3c715701 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Feb 19, 2002, 2:16am
It only takes a while to discover how things are stored in your cache.
After you figure it out, it takes mere seconds to grab a texture from an
object path in a world you've been at.
-silenced
[View Quote]"lady jude" <LadyJude51 at aol.com> wrote in message
news:3c71cfbf$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> *fingers itching*
>
> Just had to take this window of opportunity to thank Roland for all that
he
> has done over the years to protect our op's :o)
>
> Still remember when all models, etc. were displayed and available in
> anyone's cache.
>
> Roland set out on a mission to mask them and to date only seq's and
textures
> need some work.
>
> I know, I know.. there ARE ways to get around the ie: RAS files, but am
> speaking for the average user who chooses not to spend endless hours on a
> fools errand trying to figure out how to screw things up.
>
> Thank you Roland
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "jerme" <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:3c717da8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> HTTP
of
> latter
> putting
> from
> there
>
>
|
Feb 20, 2002, 12:47am
Wow, yet another insightful post. Do tell why you're so much more mature
"filmkr." You seem to attack anyone and everyone who disagree's with you.
And trust me, you're not professional.
-silenced
[View Quote]"filmkr" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3C7303A9.4A7BCF54 at privacy.com...
> Since you know no factual data nornny why not just keep your mouth shut?
> Heartfall World Hosting is one of the largest most reliable hosting
services
> around. http://worldhosting.heartfall.com It has been around for many
years
> and hosts hundreds of extremely satisfied customers. The service they get
is the
> the reason they refer so many of their friends. You just can't seem to
help
> yourself from making comments can you? It's a shame you cannot post
anything
> useful to readers other than those opinions. I posted replies because I
was sick
> of the abusive nature people had in the world builders newsgroups. Kids
like
> yourself who just like to flame rather than offer anything of value. If
you wish
> to see the things that the Heartfall group does for users view some of
these
> pages. http://www.heartfall.com/grounds/
http://www.heartfall.com/unicorns/
> http://www.heartfall.com/cobras/ http://www.heartfall.com/mechs/
> http://avatars.heartfall.com We spend our time making new and
innovative ways
> for people to make unique worlds like A!!usion , SouI <cap i and
Serenity To
> show users what they can do other than flat worlds. We are always helping
> people 7 days a week.
>
>
> nornny11 wrote:
>
non-professionalism
better).
comments.
know
newsgroup 3
servers
but it
looks
an
searching
you
and
sakes
with
server
to
bit
what is
here
posts of
opening
at
if
RGB
>
|
Feb 19, 2002, 3:12pm
I don't know about anyone else, but I enjoy building in AW :). It's always
fun to go exploring and find old buildings and see how they were built with
the old browsers.
I'd like to keep AW, although it is falling apart :). Maybe AW should
revamp the GZ (with the old objects and not with those new ones). Maybe
it's just me but those new ones drop framerates down badly.
-silenced
[View Quote]"kellee" <kellee at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3c728164 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Has any one noticed how obsolete Alpha World is? It's avatars are tinny,
the
> objects are a hodge podge of left-overs and the vast majority of the older
> builds are as good as destroyed by revisions to the browser.
>
> Has any one stopped to wonder, what sort of a drain on AWcorps resources
> this out of date world is? As you already know, further upgrades to the
> browser are made difficult as the developers attempt ( and don't always
> succeed) to make new compatible with the old. Lets face it, after 7 years
> Alpha is sad and tired and pulls down the general standard of the
> ActiveWorlds experience for newbies. And the life blood of any community
AND
> company is newbies.
>
> As much as I love Alpha World and her many beautiful builds I firmly
believe
> that it should pass on. With enough warning that citizens can transfer
their
> builds and any others that are worth saving to a new world and make the
> necessary changes that it would take, only the unwanted rubbish would be
> left behind. It is important that any product keep up with the times in
> order to be a viable option as a marketable asset and our sentiment for
old
> Alpha is going to destroy that and our community.
>
> I know ppl are going to be upset by this view but stop and think before
you
> post a negative response. How many ppl see AW GZ as sadly in need of a
> refit? Compare Alpha World to many other worlds. The answer is obvious,
the
> old girl has seen better days.
>
> We want this software to continue and grow , both for AW's good and our
own.
> The more newbies that we can impress with the technology and with our
> community , the more chance we ALL have of staying in our virtual home
away
> from home.
>
>
|
Feb 21, 2002, 5:45pm
joeman (Joeman at bootdown.com) wrote on Thursday 21 February 2002 02:16 pm:
> If you read any of this at all, you would know its awc bot databasing all
> the worlds for a new 3.3 search thing...
Hmm.. but why does it even need to enter the world? Nothing relevant could
be pulled from it really. Unless you're grabbing the welcome message or
something. In which case they should've posted something about this.
-Silenced
Feb 21, 2002, 7:38pm
They may be excluded completely from all ejections if they have the awld
priv on.
-Silenced
[View Quote]"joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
news:3c75684d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> They can be added to the eject list by hand, under world options >
> ejection's.
>
> -Joe
>
> "foxmccloud" <FoxMcCloud at cyberbrain.com> wrote in message
> news:3c756653$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> 3c75557c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> priviledges of citizen 1 can not be ejected. I guess they could enter
> whatever the ejection etc... (have to test this though)
>
>
|
Feb 21, 2002, 7:54pm
Hmm, but don't you think that AWCom would've added a feature in so if you're
using AWLD's privs that you'd be exempt from that? (but they can just
delete the ejection anyways)
-Silenced
[View Quote]"joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
news:3c756b6a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I don't think so, adding the ejection by hand will just disconnect all
> clients with that IP, regardless if they are using the #1 cit.
>
> -Joe
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3c7568c4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Feb 21, 2002, 8:45pm
Uh.. just because you've ejected them doesn't mean they don't have the
powers to uneject themselves or delete the ejection. This is the Universe
Admin privilage we're talking about.
They just didn't do anything about it when you did eject them. Most likely
from ill-interest.
-Silenced
[View Quote]"joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
news:3c75706d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> They cant delete the ejection if they are ejected. I have ejected people
> with AWLD rights plenty of times.
>
> -Joe
>
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3c756c89$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you're
> awld
> using
> enter
>
>
|
Feb 22, 2002, 5:32am
The user submits their site to the search engine. I thought indexing bots
just check for updates. My website hasn't been indexed in a search engine
and the bots visit it all the time.
Still a little warning would've been nice that they're testing this. And
instead of a bot doing all this, a submit site where we can submit our own
world info would've been great. Welcome messages and world titles sometimes
don't have anything to do with what's going on in the world.
-Silenced
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3c75ee7f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> How in the hell do search engines work, ananas?
>
> SW Chris
>
> "ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message
news:3C75D773.D0D667B4 at oct31.de...
go
> world
> news:3C7558AB.DD719CDF at oct31.de...
>
>
|
Feb 22, 2002, 2:36pm
What if the land is posted private property? It's still breaking the law.
Not only that but it recorded information about it without the expressed
permission of the owners. Well all be, that's also illegal. If it's
public, it's open to users, not bots.
As Filmkr pointed out, a good point for once, it's on his computer and not
at AW's local office. I think this is also illegal.
-Silenced
[View Quote]"holistic1" <tkafader at southstar.org> wrote in message
news:3C769837.F3ED9558 at southstar.org...
> Well children, the bot entered Holistic and left, BFD!!. Thats about as
bad as cutting across
> ones lawn, so what?. Grow up. No harm, no foul. I am sure you all can
think of something more
> worthwhile to bitch about than this. And don't talk to me about your
precious "rights" being
> crossed. Bullshit. You know damn well that you are only licensed to USE
the world and browser
> software, so don't get into such a huff when the owners decide to stop in
and check PUBLICLY
> available information.
>
> Holistic1
>
> ananas wrote:
>
30929 50
'[Search Spider]' 0 1
0x0
DISCONNECTED
>
|
Feb 22, 2002, 3:51pm
> From what I can tell AWLD has made not formal request nor have they
> stated it was them. I have seen someone who has a screen name of Mcgrim
> claim it was AW work but here is the problem.
>
> 1. The IP is located in the Atlanta area as being owned by COX
> Communications. That indicates that it is a cable internet connection of
> a private household.
It's in San Diego, not Atlanta.
Here's the trace route:
Tracing route to wsip68-15-23-167.sd.sd.cox.net [68.15.23.167]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 13 ms 14 ms <10 ms 10.100.224.1
2 14 ms <10 ms 14 ms 24.92.227.216
3 13 ms 14 ms 14 ms 24.92.225.201
4 14 ms 14 ms 13 ms pop1-alb-P4-1.atdn.net [64.236.4.9]
5 13 ms 28 ms 14 ms bb2-alb-P0-0.atdn.net [64.236.4.5]
6 28 ms 27 ms 14 ms bb2-new-P6-0.atdn.net [64.236.7.30]
7 14 ms 27 ms 14 ms bb1-new-P7-0.atdn.net [64.236.7.5]
8 28 ms 27 ms 28 ms bb1-ash-P13-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.97]
9 27 ms 28 ms 27 ms bb1-dtc-P0-2.atdn.net [66.185.152.114]
10 28 ms 27 ms 27 ms bb1-mtc-P9-0.atdn.net [66.185.152.190]
11 41 ms 28 ms 41 ms pop2-mtc-P14-0.atdn.net [66.185.143.234]
12 27 ms 55 ms 28 ms so-6-3-0.gar1.wdc1.Level3.net [209.0.227.97]
13 28 ms 27 ms 28 ms so-0-0-0.gar2.Washington1.level3.net
[209.247.8.170]
14 27 ms 28 ms 27 ms unknown.Level3.net [64.159.1.193]
15 82 ms 82 ms 97 ms so-2-0-0.mp1.SanDiego1.Level3.net
[64.159.0.238]
16 82 ms 96 ms 82 ms gige9-0.hsipaccess2.SanDiego1.Level3.net
[64.159.1.54] (note it's in San Diego at this point)
17 96 ms 83 ms 82 ms unknown.Level3.net [63.214.191.46]
18 96 ms 82 ms 96 ms 68.1.0.205
19 83 ms 96 ms 82 ms 68.6.8.21
20 82 ms 96 ms 83 ms 68.6.9.98
21 110 ms 110 ms 123 ms wsip68-15-23-167.sd.sd.cox.net
[68.15.23.167]
(final destination is San Diego Cox.net 68.15.23.167)
-Silenced
Feb 22, 2002, 4:20pm
Uh no, private property is owned by the owner. That's the only way you can
post it legally. If we're paying for a world license and the virtual land
without paying on an installment plan, we also own that too. We're not
leasing it, at least not under their license agreement. We're talking about
property, not an apartment btw, they're two completely different things. AW
still owns the software yes, but they don't own your information. Why do
some people feel the need to protect a company's illegal actions? AW may
own the universe, they don't own the worlds though. Just like the gov't,
they can't come onto your property or search it without a warrent. (I'm
speaking for the United States since AW is a US based business.. until AW is
on your local stock markets, it's going to be a US based business)
-Silenced
> What you are failing to get into your head is that, using your analogy,
the so
> called "private property" is just leased not owned. Gads, as the property
owner,
> aw doesn't need your persmission to come in. It is only a courtesy that
> property owners notify before entering NOT a legal requirement. Ask any
apt.
> complex owner. they always reserve the right to enter. and remember
that even
> though the software sits on your computer, AW still owns it.
Feb 22, 2002, 4:31pm
The browser is different then the world license, do you even own worlds? AW
clearly did search the worlds, MrGrimm said he grabbed some info.
-Silenced
[View Quote]"holistic1" <tkafader at southstar.org> wrote in message
news:3C76B566.DC789F7B at southstar.org...
> silenced, I am not even going to bother with this. read the agreements
that
> you clicked on when you installed the software. and aw didn't search the
> worlds.... gads people get a grip.
>
> have a wonderful weekend....shutting down now...byebye
>
> silenced wrote:
>
can
land
about
AW
do
may
gov't,
AW is
analogy,
property
that
any
>
|
Feb 22, 2002, 5:41pm
His saying "I own a PC, and I wrote a screenplay... you going to tell me the
motherboard's manufacturer has rights to that copyrighted work?" is exactly
what everyone is agreeing with.
Any past discressions against him should be ignored at this moment, because
you're saying AW is allowed to do that, even though it should be hard drive
and not motherboard. Although these worlds may not be copyrighted, we gave
them money for their goods, it's ours now until it expires.
> motherboard's
>
> Your comparison is flawed. AW always has had access to *ALL* worlds in
their
> universe.
It doesn't make it right to take information without consent.
licensed
> use of software and advertised it's uses
>
> Have they stolen your builds and used them for their own purposes? No.
He said "like" that means he's comparing, he didn't say they did. They did
take information without consent.
them
> to rewrite the rules
for
> new users yes,
>
> uhh... no. The rules haven't changed. Even if they did, it's not fraud.
You
> don't *have* to use AW's software and can leave at any time.
He payed for use, maybe you didn't. It is illegal to change the "rules" for
old users after they've payed for use. As he said, it's fraud. That could
very easily be reported to the BBB.
saying
> they rewrote the license
deception,
> false advertising and fraud to say the least.
>
> You are just pulling things out of thin air here.
No it's true. Let's go back to holistic's apartment analogy. If your
landlord rewrote your lease after you signed and agreed to it, that's
illegal. Again, AW has to follow US business laws. And the world license
is far, far different then the browser license.
-Silenced
Feb 22, 2002, 6:25pm
It deals with the community and worldbuilders. The community deserves to
know what AW's doing behind their backs.
-Silenced
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3C76A5DE.20105 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> For the love of all that's holy, take this crap to worldbuilders! That's
> what it's there for!
>
> ananas wrote:
>
30929 50
'[Search Spider]' 0 1
0x0
DISCONNECTED
>
>
> --
> Goober King
> And some of these people are the same ones who whine when *others* post
> off-topic! :P
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
>
|
Feb 22, 2002, 6:28pm
Calm down there.. he was disagreeing with Agent1, not you. His tone was
very sarcastic.
-Silenced
[View Quote]"filmkr" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3C76A7C1.ECCB1367 at privacy.com...
> Read again KAH! I was pointing out how AW DOES NOT!!!! Own the copyrights
to
> other's intellectual property. I showed an example of how absurd people
who
> are saying AW owns the software so they have free rein over to do as they
wish
> is simply not legal! I am very well versed in intellectual properties,
> copyrights, entertainment and the publishing arts.
>
> kah wrote:
>
own
So
thinking,
PROPERTY
you
it's
allow
one
fraud.
>
|
Feb 22, 2002, 6:33pm
So
> thinking,
>
> When did I ever say that?
You implied it in your previous response to Filmkr.
>
>
> I never said they owned the contents of a world.
No, but it sounded like you believe they have every right to copy things.
>
> owner!!! Not the AWC's!!!
>
> So?
So, AWCom has no right to take anything without permission.
>
>
> What about not being rude just because I questioned an article you posted
> about your bot on AWNews.com?
What about not bringing other topics in to boost your ego?
-Silenced
Feb 22, 2002, 6:45pm
Again, I wasn't responding to you, it was to agent1. Please, follow who the
response is to in the thread. At the moment, I agree with you.
-Silenced
[View Quote]"filmkr" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3C76AA9D.FF478D4A at privacy.com...
> I never Implied AW had any rights to do those things, read again. I have
stated
> from the very beginning though out this all that AW is acting out
illegally and
> with no regard to world owner's property rights whatsoever.
>
> My mention of screenplay copyrights was to show an example to those who
are
> crying AW owns it all and can do as they please. My Reply = There are laws
and
> they CANNOT "Legally" read my entire posts and you will see that.
>
>
>
> silenced wrote:
>
does.
computer
things.
it's
posted
>
|
Feb 22, 2002, 10:31pm
Nah, just would've been nice if we were informed of their intention at the
get go instead of oops, that's my bot, don't fret, I didn't do anything.
-Silenced
[View Quote]"grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:3c76decd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Oooohh Ananas ... Look what you've done!! What the hell happened
here?
>
> Has it occurred to anyone that if the intention was to read/steal any
> information from within a world, they would have found a much more
inventive
> way of doing it that sticking a damned bot in the world for a few seconds.
I
> can't believe so many people are taking offense at this ... is it just
part
> of the "Bash AW at any opportunity" mentaility or are people seriously so
> uptight that this is a major issue for them?
>
> "ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message
news:3C74974A.DF5201FC at oct31.de...
30929
> 50
> '[Search Spider]' 0 1
> 0x0
DISCONNECTED
>
>
|
|
