|
Solar system's 10th planet confirmed (Community)
Solar system's 10th planet confirmed // Community
Mar 15, 2004, 5:29pm
Well, we don't have a general NG anymore but I thought I'd post this anyway;
seeing as how the last planet was discovered some 70 years ago.
Planet Sedna is our new 10th planet confirmed by NASA =O
Here's the news url with details:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,114178,00.html
Mar 15, 2004, 5:30pm
cool thanks
[View Quote]"sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:4056041b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well, we don't have a general NG anymore but I thought I'd post this
anyway;
> seeing as how the last planet was discovered some 70 years ago.
>
> Planet Sedna is our new 10th planet confirmed by NASA =O
>
> Here's the news url with details:
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,114178,00.html
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 5:53pm
Actually after rereading that I'm not sure if they've officially classified
it as a planet. They're just calling it a "planetoid" in that artical O_o
[View Quote]"sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:4056041b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well, we don't have a general NG anymore but I thought I'd post this
anyway;
> seeing as how the last planet was discovered some 70 years ago.
>
> Planet Sedna is our new 10th planet confirmed by NASA =O
>
> Here's the news url with details:
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,114178,00.html
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 6:45pm
Too large to be an asteroid, too small to be a planet.
[View Quote]"sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:405609b2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Actually after rereading that I'm not sure if they've officially
classified
> it as a planet. They're just calling it a "planetoid" in that artical O_o
>
>
> "sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote in message
> news:4056041b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> anyway;
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 7:12pm
That's not a moon... It's a space station!
: )
[View Quote]"starfleet" <Starfleet> wrote in message
news:40561607$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Too large to be an asteroid, too small to be a planet.
>
> "sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote in message
> news:405609b2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> classified
O_o
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 7:40pm
Yea...they are constructing a Death Star lol
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:40561c2d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That's not a moon... It's a space station!
>
>
> : )
>
>
>
> "starfleet" <Starfleet> wrote in message
> news:40561607$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> O_o
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 7:48pm
No, a borg sphere..rofl
[View Quote]"lord fett" <lordfett at vectracon.com> wrote in message
news:405622b6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Yea...they are constructing a Death Star lol
>
> "e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:40561c2d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
artical
this
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 8:08pm
No Enzo!
The planet itself is a space station :-P
LOL!
~John
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:40561c2d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That's not a moon... It's a space station!
>
>
> : )
>
>
>
> "starfleet" <Starfleet> wrote in message
> news:40561607$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> O_o
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 8:48pm
Neither, all wrong
Its something Arthur C Clark put up there to keep selling books
[View Quote]"johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.com.no-spam-please> wrote in message
news:40562971 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> No Enzo!
>
> The planet itself is a space station :-P
>
> LOL!
>
> ~John
>
> "e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:40561c2d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
artical
this
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 8:53pm
After reading another article, it seems that it's currently undecided as to
whether or not it's a planet. They're debating it =P
Seems more like a rogue moon to me.
[View Quote]"starfleet" <Starfleet> wrote in message
news:40561607$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Too large to be an asteroid, too small to be a planet.
>
> "sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote in message
> news:405609b2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> classified
O_o
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 8:53pm
Is it an obelisk?
~John
[View Quote]"wizard myrddin" <admin at rdescape.co.uk> wrote in message
news:405632d2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Neither, all wrong
>
> Its something Arthur C Clark put up there to keep selling books
>
>
>
> "johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.com.no-spam-please> wrote in message
> news:40562971 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> artical
> this
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 8:57pm
Yep dam hackers get everywhere :-)
[View Quote]"sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:405633ef at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> After reading another article, it seems that it's currently undecided as
to
> whether or not it's a planet. They're debating it =P
>
> Seems more like a rogue moon to me.
>
> "starfleet" <Starfleet> wrote in message
> news:40561607$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> O_o
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 9:07pm
arthur c clarke =D
[View Quote]"wizard myrddin" <admin at rdescape.co.uk> wrote in message
news:405632d2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Neither, all wrong
>
> Its something Arthur C Clark put up there to keep selling books
>
>
>
> "johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.com.no-spam-please> wrote in message
> news:40562971 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> artical
> this
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 9:08pm
Opps dropped my "E" off must have been a sleepy one
rofl
[View Quote]"casey n qrv o" <caseyangel_usa at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:40563714 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> arthur c clarke =D
>
> "wizard myrddin" <admin at rdescape.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:405632d2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
post
ago.
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 10:00pm
hahaha good one!! ^5 ;-"D
[View Quote]"wizard myrddin" <admin at rdescape.co.uk> wrote in message
news:405632d2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Neither, all wrong
>
> Its something Arthur C Clark put up there to keep selling books
>
>
>
> "johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.com.no-spam-please> wrote in message
> news:40562971 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> artical
> this
>
>
|
Mar 15, 2004, 10:57pm
[View Quote]sw comit wrote:
> After reading another article, it seems that it's currently undecided as to
> whether or not it's a planet. They're debating it =P
>
> Seems more like a rogue moon to me.
|
I see no reason why it can't be classified as a planet.
Mar 15, 2004, 11:27pm
Hmm, nice. Well even Pluto and its sligtly smaller moon (actually a
double planet system) are not by all astrononers considered as
planets, they crave to fall into the planetoid (not a planet but
almost) category. Sedna certaily falls into this category.
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/world/8194021.htm?1c
A huge rock, far far away!
Alex
[View Quote]On 15 Mar 2004 14:29:31 -0500, "sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote:
|
>Well, we don't have a general NG anymore but I thought I'd post this anyway;
>seeing as how the last planet was discovered some 70 years ago.
>
>Planet Sedna is our new 10th planet confirmed by NASA =O
>
>Here's the news url with details:
>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,114178,00.html
>
Mar 15, 2004, 11:30pm
Any reason why it should?
[View Quote]On 15 Mar 2004 19:57:26 -0500, "bowen" <newoB at sardna.ten> wrote:
|
[View Quote]>sw comit wrote:
>
>I see no reason why it can't be classified as a planet.
|
Mar 16, 2004, 12:09am
becuase there might be a bigger object near it
[View Quote]
[View Quote]> sw comit wrote:
>
>
>
> I see no reason why it can't be classified as a planet.
|
Mar 16, 2004, 12:58am
[View Quote]xelag wrote:
> Any reason why it should?
|
Why base naming convetions on size? Why not on shape?
Mar 16, 2004, 1:09am
If anyone in the Universe sees this citname and citnumber: Bonzai, #311518,
Eject immeaditly. It is M a t t doing exploits around the universe, behind a
proxy, a verizon DSL proxy (Not really him).
If he vanalizes your world with a qwest IP, that is him.
(22:06:15) . Looking up host of 65.141.54.205 ...
(22:06:15) * Resolved 65.141.54.205 to
0-2pool54-205.nas2.pikeville1.ky.us.da.qwest.net
If anyone really wanted it.
M a t t, any further attacks of me will pile up my revenge to you my friend.
Nice try, but it isn't called pwnage, it's called stupidity and pretty much
notthing near of it.
--
Signed,
TheMask
:: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
Free world hosting.. Just a T-Gram will do it.
http://www.delusional-minds.com
[View Quote]"sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:4056041b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well, we don't have a general NG anymore but I thought I'd post this
anyway;
> seeing as how the last planet was discovered some 70 years ago.
>
> Planet Sedna is our new 10th planet confirmed by NASA =O
>
> Here's the news url with details:
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,114178,00.html
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2004, 1:10am
err, wrong place.
--
Signed,
TheMask
:: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
Free world hosting.. Just a T-Gram will do it.
http://www.delusional-minds.com
[View Quote]"themask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
news:40566ffe$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If anyone in the Universe sees this citname and citnumber: Bonzai,
#311518,
> Eject immeaditly. It is M a t t doing exploits around the universe, behind
a
> proxy, a verizon DSL proxy (Not really him).
>
> If he vanalizes your world with a qwest IP, that is him.
>
> (22:06:15) . Looking up host of 65.141.54.205 ...
> (22:06:15) * Resolved 65.141.54.205 to
> 0-2pool54-205.nas2.pikeville1.ky.us.da.qwest.net
>
> If anyone really wanted it.
>
> M a t t, any further attacks of me will pile up my revenge to you my
friend.
> Nice try, but it isn't called pwnage, it's called stupidity and pretty
much
> notthing near of it.
>
> --
>
> Signed,
> TheMask
>
> :: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
> Free world hosting.. Just a T-Gram will do it.
>
> http://www.delusional-minds.com
>
> "sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote in message
> news:4056041b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> anyway;
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2004, 1:44am
i think trees on Mars is more interesting
http://www.curiousnotions.com/mars/mars_plants.html
[View Quote]"xelag" <xelag at digitalspace.com> wrote in message
news:uclc50pa244394kmf3p3s8mig6pv9suh4c at 4ax.com...
> Hmm, nice. Well even Pluto and its sligtly smaller moon (actually a
> double planet system) are not by all astrononers considered as
> planets, they crave to fall into the planetoid (not a planet but
> almost) category. Sedna certaily falls into this category.
>
> http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/world/8194021.htm?1c
>
> A huge rock, far far away!
>
> Alex
>
> On 15 Mar 2004 14:29:31 -0500, "sw comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote:
>
anyway;
>
|
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.618 / Virus Database: 397 - Release Date: 9/03/2004
Mar 16, 2004, 2:39pm
I've gotta bad feelin about this...
E
[View Quote]"johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.com.no-spam-please> wrote in message
news:40562971 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> No Enzo!
>
> The planet itself is a space station :-P
>
> LOL!
>
> ~John
>
> "e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:40561c2d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
artical
this
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2004, 4:47pm
Yes, Luke - you have to go and fight Darth Tenth-Planet-Owner
:-P
LOL
~John
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:40572db1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I've gotta bad feelin about this...
>
>
> E
>
>
> "johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.com.no-spam-please> wrote in message
> news:40562971 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> artical
> this
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2004, 5:03pm
ehh, what's up doc? time fer some west and wewaxtion! =D
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:40572db1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I've gotta bad feelin about this...
>
>
> E
>
>
> "johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.com.no-spam-please> wrote in message
> news:40562971 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> artical
> this
>
>
|
Mar 21, 2004, 3:58pm
If it goes round our sun it's our planet right? To me, it doesn't even
matter if it's 1cm in diameter.
[View Quote]xelag wrote:
> Any reason why it should?
>
> On 15 Mar 2004 19:57:26 -0500, "bowen" <newoB at sardna.ten> wrote:
>
>
>
>
|
Mar 22, 2004, 12:35am
So than I guess that means all of the asteroids in the asteroid belt are
planets as well...
There are certain characteristics a planet has to fullfill to be considered
a planet ;P
[View Quote]"rossyboy" <rossyboy at vwtv.org> wrote in message
news:405dd7d7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If it goes round our sun it's our planet right? To me, it doesn't even
> matter if it's 1cm in diameter.
|
Mar 22, 2004, 1:14am
LOL I'll throw a rock at him and he'll claim I threw a planet at him.
hahahahahahahhaaha
[View Quote]"zeofatex" <greg at warpedsoap.com> wrote in message
news:405e50e7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> So than I guess that means all of the asteroids in the asteroid belt are
> planets as well...
>
> There are certain characteristics a planet has to fullfill to be
considered
> a planet ;P
>
>
> "rossyboy" <rossyboy at vwtv.org> wrote in message
> news:405dd7d7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Mar 22, 2004, 3:25am
[View Quote]
> LOL I'll throw a rock at him and he'll claim I threw a planet at him.
> hahahahahahahhaaha
After some thinking, I think orbit should be the determining factor of
an object in space. Also the number of objects in proximity and their
orbits as well should play an important part in the classification of
spatial bodies.
Meteors would be free floating bodies (there are meteor belts though..
hence the proximity of other objects)... then there's planets and their
moons.. then asteroids.. then stars.
|