|
Re: CY Results? (Community)
Re: CY Results? // Community
May 27, 2004, 9:15am
KEWL QWOTE :))))))
I HOPE N0BUDY ATAKS THE DOGHOUSE AGAIN
NOW LISNING 2: DANSE DANSE REVOLUSHUN REMIXES (PIRYTED OF COURSE!!!!111
LOLZ!!!111)
- ROSYBOY
- FAITHFUL HUSBEND 2 MANDY/SEIYA
[View Quote]anneteak wrote:
> Here for you pro-war die hards is a quote from one of your very own full
> blooded American Natives. Makes alot of sense to me since all this killing
> and invading of another country was not at all necessary. And now it seems
> it's coming to light that there were underlying reasons that this whole war
> took place which had absolutely nothing to do with terrorism or freedom of
> the American people.
>
> Quote by Daywalker:
>
> The military hasn't had to protect me from anything except terrorists, and
> fighting this war in iraq is avoiding attacking any of the nations that the
> terrorists that bombed us live in or that al-Qaeda is rumored to be harbored
> by.
>
> Let's see...they didn't protect me in the first Gulf War either, I do not
> live in Kuwait.
>
> Before that...they did not protect any Americans from invasion by the evil
> Vietnamese.
>
> Nor did Korea actually threaten the US then. Hell, they have nukes now...we
> still don't consider them enough of a threat to worry about.
>
> Japan, there's a coutry that actually threatened America. Except...Hawaii
> did not become a state until after WW2...so that was not really an attack on
> our country...it was an attack on a military base. So, the Japanese attacked
> the military, not the people of this nation or this nation's land...so the
> military defended Europe from the Germans and fought to protect ITSELF from
> Japan. That's still not protecting the freedoms of the people of this nation
> at all.
>
> WW1? Nope. No one here protected.
>
> Spanish American War? Expansionism. There would have been no need to protect
> Americans from anyone if we were not trying to take land from other nations
> by force.
>
> Civil War? Us fighting each other. No one was fighting for the freedom of
> Americans...actually, the fighting for freedom was being done by the faction
> who wanted to stop Americans and start their own country.
>
> When, exactly, is the last time the military fought to protect the freedoms
> of Americans? The last time we were actually threatened with a takeover?
> Like...the war of 1812 maybe?
>
> That's almost 200 years ago. I was not here, neither were you. The men who
> actually fought and dies protecting the freedoms of American citizens were
> long dead before your grandmother was a gleam in your great grandfather's
> eye.
>
> Also, just a note, I'm black and Native American....and those men sure as
> hell were not fighting to protect MY freedoms at all when they fought the
> English again. So no one's fought for my freedom, except for the
> Revolutionary war...but wait...no, that wasn't to free people like me
> either.
>
> In other words, our military has not fought for your freedom in about two
> centuries, and never fought for mine at all.
>
> End Quote
>
>
> Maybe the ones who are too young to know any better should listen when the
> elders who've been around a while talk. They have some idea what they're
> talking about.
>
>
|
|
