ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Active Worlds television (Community)
Active Worlds television // Communitysgeo ~~~Jul 2, 2004, 10:41pm
This is just to point out that with the media command in 3.6, Active Worlds
TV should be completely different c pJul 3, 2004, 2:05am
YUP ttv has been working its bum bum off trying to get ready for it
hopefully our server can take it. [View Quote] strike rapierJul 3, 2004, 6:49am
the 3.6 streaming capability would be more use for watching streams for
perhaps the BBC etc as I doubt very much that in anything above a month that such bandwidth drain (even on a 64kb stream) would be unsustainable. - MR [View Quote] builderzJul 3, 2004, 4:01pm
Correct. However, I don't think all AW TV stations will move over and
use Windows Media Streaming for various reasons. Here is a good host that does Windows Media streams: http://www.advection.net Builderz http://www.3DHost.net builderzJul 3, 2004, 4:06pm
Well, you can get a dedicated Windows server in a professional data
center in the U.S. for about $69 USD per month with 500 GB of bandwidth. If you want 1000 GB of bandwidth, expect to pay about $120 USD per month. And of course, there is colocation if you already have your own server. If someone has the money and the knowledge, they could setup a few Windows Media Streams on one of these servers. Builderz http://www.3DHost.net rossyboyJul 3, 2004, 9:31pm
rossyboyJul 3, 2004, 9:33pm
Probably too much bandwidth for most.
Streaming media isn't synonymous with live media. Streaming media quite commonly just means a streaming recording, i.e. playing it as you download it. [View Quote] > This is just to point out that with the media command in 3.6, Active Worlds > TV should be completely different > > builderzJul 3, 2004, 9:59pm
As far as I know, the server portion to stream Windows Media content
only works on Windows. Other uses are for ASP, ColdFusion and MS SQL databases. Builderz http://www.3DHost.net strike rapierJul 5, 2004, 6:39pm
|
