|
|
Somewhat proof of 9/11 was somewhat lies, the FBI lies, and Bush lies.. (Community)
Somewhat proof of 9/11 was somewhat lies, the FBI lies, and Bush lies.. // Community
Sep 3, 2004, 11:16am
That's not proof of anything. That's just inconclusive evidence that could
support either theory. Anyway it's obvious you don't know your stuff if you
think it was a intercontinental 747 that crashed into the Pentagon :P
Sep 3, 2004, 5:04pm
I never said it was a 747. I said a 747 could not be that small; there huge
planes that weigh tons.
--
Signed,
TheMask
:: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
Free world hosting.. Just a T-Gram will do it.
[View Quote]"ferruccio" <startrek3 at earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:41386ecb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That's not proof of anything. That's just inconclusive evidence that
could
> support either theory. Anyway it's obvious you don't know your stuff if
you
> think it was a intercontinental 747 that crashed into the Pentagon :P
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2004, 5:45pm
ya, but what ferr is saying, is that they reported that a 757 crashed
through, no 747 :)
-SWE
[View Quote]"themask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
news:4138c022$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I never said it was a 747. I said a 747 could not be that small; there
huge
> planes that weigh tons.
>
> --
>
> Signed,
> TheMask
>
> :: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
> Free world hosting.. Just a T-Gram will do it.
>
> "ferruccio" <startrek3 at earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:41386ecb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> could
> you
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2004, 6:15pm
My guess is the plane was shot down by our own military. The missile was so
that no-one would think we shot it down. Way before a plane flies over a
military owned property it must inform them in written flight plans -- their
exact course. The plane was probably heading towards the pentagon and was
shot down. Maybe they shot another missile AT the pentagon as a cover up and
evacuated that wing before it was fired. Who knows. Just a theory. Seems
possible to. :)
[View Quote]"swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
news:4138c9f4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> ya, but what ferr is saying, is that they reported that a 757 crashed
> through, no 747 :)
>
> -SWE
>
> "themask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
> news:4138c022$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> huge
if
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2004, 6:15pm
Err well than again that leaves us to wonder where the hell the plane is...
(Sorry for double-post)
[View Quote]"zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4138d0d3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> My guess is the plane was shot down by our own military. The missile was
so
> that no-one would think we shot it down. Way before a plane flies over a
> military owned property it must inform them in written flight plans --
their
> exact course. The plane was probably heading towards the pentagon and was
> shot down. Maybe they shot another missile AT the pentagon as a cover up
and
> evacuated that wing before it was fired. Who knows. Just a theory. Seems
> possible to. :)
>
>
> "swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
> news:4138c9f4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
that
stuff
> if
:P
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2004, 7:22pm
huh? dont get you lol. if they shot down the plane, it wouldn't have hit, so
why would they hit the pentagon, if it wasn't already hit, and then say it
was hit by a plane? :)
-SWE
[View Quote]"zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4138d0d3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> My guess is the plane was shot down by our own military. The missile was
so
> that no-one would think we shot it down. Way before a plane flies over a
> military owned property it must inform them in written flight plans --
their
> exact course. The plane was probably heading towards the pentagon and was
> shot down. Maybe they shot another missile AT the pentagon as a cover up
and
> evacuated that wing before it was fired. Who knows. Just a theory. Seems
> possible to. :)
>
>
> "swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
> news:4138c9f4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
that
stuff
> if
:P
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2004, 10:40pm
Another conspiracy theory, you mean, with no reasonable evidence that could
reasonably support your theory. Despite how convincing it may sound, the
flash thingy had no reasonable evidence to support such a conspiracy. :P
[View Quote]"zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4138d0d3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> My guess is the plane was shot down by our own military. The missile was
> so
> that no-one would think we shot it down. Way before a plane flies over a
> military owned property it must inform them in written flight plans --
> their
> exact course. The plane was probably heading towards the pentagon and was
> shot down. Maybe they shot another missile AT the pentagon as a cover up
> and
> evacuated that wing before it was fired. Who knows. Just a theory. Seems
> possible to. :)
>
>
> "swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
> news:4138c9f4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> if
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2004, 10:42pm
If the government really wanted to cover it up, then why wouldn't they just
be smart and make huge scorch marks in the grass as well? They aren't
stupid, you know.
[View Quote]"swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
news:4138e082 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> huh? dont get you lol. if they shot down the plane, it wouldn't have hit,
> so
> why would they hit the pentagon, if it wasn't already hit, and then say it
> was hit by a plane? :)
>
> -SWE
>
> "zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4138d0d3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> so
> their
> and
> that
> stuff
> :P
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2004, 10:49pm
maybe they didn't have enough time to think it up, and then put the marks,
before the camera crew came. would be stupid to have people take pictures
when the grass is normal, then have pictures, which were taken hours later,
show marks :)
-SWE
[View Quote]"ferruccio" <startrek3 at earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:41390f66$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If the government really wanted to cover it up, then why wouldn't they
just
> be smart and make huge scorch marks in the grass as well? They aren't
> stupid, you know.
>
> "swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
> news:4138e082 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
hit,
it
was
a
was
up
Seems
Pentagon
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2004, 11:33pm
The very 1st time i heard about ti on the news was the 1st time it was
reported (I was watchuing tv at that time) The reporter said The plane was
shot down over Pa. After that one report shot down was never mentioned
again. I have always wondered about that. It has always been in the back of
my mind that it was shot down and they hushed it up right away.
[View Quote]"zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4138d0d3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> My guess is the plane was shot down by our own military. The missile was
so
> that no-one would think we shot it down. Way before a plane flies over a
> military owned property it must inform them in written flight plans --
their
> exact course. The plane was probably heading towards the pentagon and was
> shot down. Maybe they shot another missile AT the pentagon as a cover up
and
> evacuated that wing before it was fired. Who knows. Just a theory. Seems
> possible to. :)
>
>
> "swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
> news:4138c9f4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
that
stuff
> if
:P
>
>
|
Sep 3, 2004, 11:34pm
OH I am talking about the one that went down in Pa.
[View Quote]"zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4138d0d3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> My guess is the plane was shot down by our own military. The missile was
so
> that no-one would think we shot it down. Way before a plane flies over a
> military owned property it must inform them in written flight plans --
their
> exact course. The plane was probably heading towards the pentagon and was
> shot down. Maybe they shot another missile AT the pentagon as a cover up
and
> evacuated that wing before it was fired. Who knows. Just a theory. Seems
> possible to. :)
>
>
> "swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
> news:4138c9f4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
that
stuff
> if
:P
>
>
|
Sep 4, 2004, 7:23am
IMO the real conspiracy here is why *weren't* the planes shot down? I don't
care how bad that looks to the public, or how inhuman this may sound; when a
potentially destructive vehicle of that sort is taken captive it is only
logical to neutralize it. Had the planes simply been shot down, the death
totals would have been in the hundreds instead of thousands. No one can
argue (well, you can if you want, but you'll just look silly) that the scale
of the tragedy hasn't been a factor in pushing us to war, which, for the
military sector of the economy, is a blessing. And don't tell me there
wasn't time to react, that's total BS. You know the instant a plane is off
its flight path. You contact them, then send military escort/intercept if
there's no response.
Our Airforce cannot possibly be *that* inept, can they? Either the military
is so incompetent they wouldn't effectively fend off an attack by a crippled
95 year old Nazi air commander flying an antique 1940's bomber loaded with
surplus soviet nukes, or they were ordered to allow those planes to hit
their targets. If the first is true, be vary scared, because anyone with a
few million dollars could kill us all tomorrow, and as such at least be
thankful someone exposed our terrible weakness without dropping "the bomb"
in the process. If the second, be equally scared, because your government
could allow you to be killed tomorrow as a martyr without your consent. If
there's a third option here, I don't see it, and I don't count "but we
couldn't shoot down our own planes." This isn't conspiracy theory, this is
logic. If I'm wrong, then prove me wrong *logically.*
Anyone?
[View Quote]"themask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
news:41352de2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> http://www.muchosucko.com/flash/pentagonlies.html#Main
>
> That video.. Is not a prank. Let the music not make you think it is a
prank.
> There are some metal music but to relate to the flash. So keep your sound
> very low but at some parts, turn them up a little.
>
> I found this VERY interesting. It may not relate to the community
> newsgroups, but i'm sure some of you are very interested in mysterious
type
> of things like this. I am. And found this a very informative flash.
>
> --
>
> Signed,
> TheMask
>
> :: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
>
>
|
Sep 4, 2004, 10:19am
Well the first two planes no-one had any idea were going into the WTCs...
but the other ones they could have done something about.
[View Quote]"ubermonkey" <ubermonkey at wcalliance.com> wrote in message
news:41398989$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> IMO the real conspiracy here is why *weren't* the planes shot down? I
don't
> care how bad that looks to the public, or how inhuman this may sound; when
a
> potentially destructive vehicle of that sort is taken captive it is only
> logical to neutralize it. Had the planes simply been shot down, the death
> totals would have been in the hundreds instead of thousands. No one can
> argue (well, you can if you want, but you'll just look silly) that the
scale
> of the tragedy hasn't been a factor in pushing us to war, which, for the
> military sector of the economy, is a blessing. And don't tell me there
> wasn't time to react, that's total BS. You know the instant a plane is off
> its flight path. You contact them, then send military escort/intercept if
> there's no response.
>
> Our Airforce cannot possibly be *that* inept, can they? Either the
military
> is so incompetent they wouldn't effectively fend off an attack by a
crippled
> 95 year old Nazi air commander flying an antique 1940's bomber loaded with
> surplus soviet nukes, or they were ordered to allow those planes to hit
> their targets. If the first is true, be vary scared, because anyone with a
> few million dollars could kill us all tomorrow, and as such at least be
> thankful someone exposed our terrible weakness without dropping "the bomb"
> in the process. If the second, be equally scared, because your government
> could allow you to be killed tomorrow as a martyr without your consent. If
> there's a third option here, I don't see it, and I don't count "but we
> couldn't shoot down our own planes." This isn't conspiracy theory, this is
> logic. If I'm wrong, then prove me wrong *logically.*
>
> Anyone?
>
> "themask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
> news:41352de2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> prank.
sound
> type
>
>
|
Sep 4, 2004, 3:39pm
that's what the govt says...
BUT thinkabout it our billions of dollars going into military and
intelligence.. we have radars, that can tell us, as well as other ways to
know that those planes where offcourse...and also flying too low!
[View Quote]"zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4139b2e2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well the first two planes no-one had any idea were going into the WTCs...
> but the other ones they could have done something about.
>
> "ubermonkey" <ubermonkey at wcalliance.com> wrote in message
> news:41398989$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> don't
> a
> scale
> military
> crippled
> sound
>
>
|
Sep 4, 2004, 3:47pm
Most of the time when someone takes over a plane they don't go crashing them
into buildings...
[View Quote]"c p" <chris101d at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4139fdd3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that's what the govt says...
>
> BUT thinkabout it our billions of dollars going into military and
> intelligence.. we have radars, that can tell us, as well as other ways to
> know that those planes where offcourse...and also flying too low!
> "zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4139b2e2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
WTCs...
only
death
the
if
with
government
mysterious
>
>
|
Sep 4, 2004, 3:51pm
yeah they fly them around and giggle...
actually air traffic control would have sent the plane messages and such
asking why they where offcourse, or if they needed help...
[View Quote]"zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4139ffb8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Most of the time when someone takes over a plane they don't go crashing
> them
> into buildings...
>
>
> "c p" <chris101d at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:4139fdd3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> WTCs...
> only
> death
> the
> if
> with
> government
> mysterious
>
>
|
Sep 4, 2004, 5:09pm
Just to let you all know, they sent fighters to the hijacked planes, but
they could not reach the planes in time.
[View Quote]"c p" <chris101d at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:413a00b9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yeah they fly them around and giggle...
>
> actually air traffic control would have sent the plane messages and such
> asking why they where offcourse, or if they needed help...
> "zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4139ffb8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Sep 4, 2004, 6:02pm
The Pentagon accident was a coverup; The plane in PA noowhere how the hell
we knew where it was was a coverup; This is my friends theory that they did
those 2 planes to make it look like it was a terrorist attack, so then Bush
could go to war in Iraq as we speak.
--
Signed,
TheMask
:: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
Free world hosting.. Just a T-Gram will do it.
[View Quote]"ciena" <nikona at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:41391bb5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> OH I am talking about the one that went down in Pa.
> "zeofatex" <gzanone[no-spam] at optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4138d0d3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> so
> their
was
> and
there
> that
> stuff
> :P
>
>
|
Sep 4, 2004, 8:27pm
If you really think that then you must be very fearful for your
life.
The men in black will be to get you soon. LOL
[View Quote]"themask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
news:413a1f5b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The Pentagon accident was a coverup; The plane in PA noowhere how the hell
> we knew where it was was a coverup; This is my friends theory that they
did
> those 2 planes to make it look like it was a terrorist attack, so then
Bush
> could go to war in Iraq as we speak.
>
>
> --
>
> Signed,
> TheMask
>
> :: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
> Free world hosting.. Just a T-Gram will do it.
>
> "ciena" <nikona at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:41391bb5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
was
a
> was
up
Seems
crashed
> there
Pentagon
>
>
|
Sep 4, 2004, 11:06pm
Like I said, where is your proof? The funny thing about conspiracy theories
is that you can make up whatever the hell kind of theory you want, and not
show any type of proof, claiming that "the big guys covered it up!!"
Another popular one is "all the media are lying to you!"
Sep 6, 2004, 12:01am
That was my friends theory from that small video.
--
Signed,
TheMask
:: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
Free world hosting.. Just a T-Gram will do it.
[View Quote]"ferruccio" <startrek3 at earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:413a667a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Like I said, where is your proof? The funny thing about conspiracy
theories
> is that you can make up whatever the hell kind of theory you want, and not
> show any type of proof, claiming that "the big guys covered it up!!"
> Another popular one is "all the media are lying to you!"
>
>
|
Sep 7, 2004, 3:51am
So I've heard...
[View Quote]"themask" <ricky at whaletech.net> wrote in message
news:413bc4e7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> That was my friends theory from that small video.
>
> --
>
> Signed,
> TheMask
>
> :: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
> Free world hosting.. Just a T-Gram will do it.
>
> "ferruccio" <startrek3 at earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:413a667a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> theories
>
>
|
|
