ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Re: world light source control bot (Bots)
Re: world light source control bot // Botsbill robertsonJul 22, 1999, 9:25pm
Man I dont know you Eep but after reading the last 800 msgs in this bot =
news area all you do is gripe & groan , you appear to be intelligent from= the looks of your web pages ......so what gives?. All you do is argue wi= th everybody from what I have read here and any input by anybody no matte= r how big or small always prompts others into ideas or did you forget you= to was once a newbie?.Maybe you just seek attention , I dont know but on= e thing I know for sure the attention your are attracting is not one of f= riendship ,and if your not happy with the way things are then learn to ch= ange them yourself and recieve the gratitude of others for your work or j= ust learn to live with what you have like everybody else does in this wor= ld ,If you cant ...your in for a rough life . warm regards Druid A [View Quote] > Ah, yes, more important things...like what, hmm? File transfer, ejectio= n, a color command, and other crap? World light source control is just ON= E of MANY things on my improvements list at http://tnlc.com/eep/aw/improv= e.html. Now, I'm not saying those other things that've been implemented a= re nice and all, but to what priority are they added to AW? AW's so-calle= d priorities seem a tad skewed. And I've seen Roland's list of AW bugs/im= provements (the last one from 10/26/98) and can tell you that maybe 5-10%= of the things on it have been done. I'd post "The List" here but Roland = has asked me not to (although with the way he's been treating me lately--= completely ignoring me--I may just post it just so everyone can see how s= tagnant AW's development truly is... (Ask him if you don't believe I have= it.) I've been in AW for over 2 years now, Jeremy, so I know AW's develo= pment history for over half of its existance. > > AWCI just doesn't seem to add what the MAJORITY of its users want. For = example: custom avatars. This was rumoured to be added to AW 2.1 way back= when it was in beta and before. Where is it? Multiple object copy was al= so another lie. Roland said this would be implemented "soon" after multip= le object select/delete was. Where is it? I'd say at least being able to = delete multiple objects should take priority before being able to transfe= r files through AW, eh? These are just 2 examples of the MANY times thing= s like this have happened since I've been in AW. And this is just yet ano= ther example of how AWCI doesn't listen to what its users want. > [View Quote] |