ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Re: Water is not accurate (Wishlist)
Re: Water is not accurate // WishlistbowenOct 17, 2002, 5:29pm
> 1. Fact ... Matter blocks light.
Good job, but xrays are light too. Xrays can pass through some matter and not others. > 2. Water is denser than air ... therefore more molecules per volume. So is glass. > 3. More molecules per volume ... more light blocked. Glass has more molecules per volume than water or air, it's a solid. > 4. More light blocked ... less light reflected by the object reaches the > eye. So you're talking about visible light again? > 5. Less light reaches the eye ... the harder it is to see the object. Right, depending on the condition of the water. > 6. The harder it is to see the object ... the less the volume of matter > between the light source (the object) and the eye to see the same > brightness. What about glass? So by your theory Silicion dioxide should block even more light (which it doesn't). > 7. Less volume of water ... object and eye are closer together. Depending on the medium that connects your eye to the water, if it's more airlike, it'll be refracted more. > Ergo ... You can't see as far in water as you can in air. Now repeat > substituting lead for water and see if it makes any more sense. Depending on which light wave we're talking about, and also which eyes we're talking about. --Bowen-- |