|
Re: HTML Posts Aren't bad (General Discussion)
Re: HTML Posts Aren't bad // General Discussion
Sep 21, 2001, 2:18pm
You do tend to take things to the "wierdo gnome" extreme, though, Kah.
--
SW Chris
Eagle Scout, Philosopher, Peacemaker, and... Kung Fu Master?
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame1.html
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3ba7c361 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> hey, Lord Perception, look over here... this is why we go mad at newbies
> that are *AWARE* of the courtesy rule "don't post in HTML", but don't
care,
> and just tell us to get HTML compatible readers, etc... and it's no point
> telling them it's bad, they just don't listen. and I'm not the worst at
> calling ppl stuff "weirdo gnome" is not very hard, just look at some other
> names employed on annoying newbies... and SOMEONE has to teach these guys
> the rules, heh? often when they are flamed newbies stop using the NGs,
> probably because they won't accept following the rules, and in that case
> they won't annoy us... this process is called evolution, only the ones
that
> are willing to adapt, etc, survive...
>
> KAH
>
> "rossyboy" <Rossyboy2 at btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> news:3ba66129 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Personally, I only use HTML so I can type in Arial... it's a change from
> boring old Times New Roman. SOME people though do overdo it... but there's
> just no non-HTML rule... if you're using a non HTML viewer, get a HTML
one!
>
>
|
|
