1  |   Order by index

Jul 18, 2002, 3:48pm

> If you use the Quick Launch feature, then it'll load even quicker than
> IE does. As for taking up space and chewing up RAM, sounds to me like
> your system could use an overhaul if it can't handle something like NS.
> As far as IE being open source, if they don't release the source, then
> it's not *open*, hence not open source. And Mozilla is funded by
> Netscape (which is funded by AOL, which is funded...), so I don't think
> Microsoft would even *want* to use them as a basis for anything.
>
> At any rate, Netscape is still better, since you didn't refute any of my
> other claims. ;)

Um, first of all, I didn't say it WAS open source, I said it was BASED on
open source. The same as netscape. I did use the quick launch, it still
took longer than IE to start up. It took up 50 mb's of my ram to run it, IE
takes 5. Mozilla was the base of IE, a long long time ago. Before AOL
owned anything but AOL.

--Bowen--

1  |   Order by index