1  |   Order by index

Aug 10, 2002, 5:08am

[View Quote] > talking about Analglish, not English. Informal English isn't so lame, but
> you had better know the difference between "worse" and "worst".
>
> Lame - unable to accomplish the task; disabled.
> slang. - weak; unsatisfactory

Very good; have you figured out which one you are yet? I'll give you a hint: both. Drive through...

>
> Subtle emphasis, why do you capitalize unimportant words like JFK2 did?

Which words did I incorrectly capitalize? "English" is a name of a language (among other things); hence why it's capitalized.

>
> So are most of your "efficient" actions. One space instead of two is
> "efficiently wrong." As is not spelling out numbers less than 11.

Hardly; you better go look up the word "efficient", sport. You're getting desperate for arguments.

> to accept your mistakes when you in your hypocracy don't accept others.
> Drive through, hypocrite-boy!
>
> If it makes you happy, sure. Hypocrite boy should not be hyphonated.

Uh, it's a compound word, idiot. Back to Grammar 101 with you.

>
> The issue with security for one. It's obvious that it was an sdk function
> to get the object password.

And how was I wrong in asking about it, hmm? No wrongness there, Bowen. More of your lameness...

> Functions like these are not overlooked and are
> put there for a reason, even if they're not documented. Some of the public
> ones aren't documented either. Andras is right, leave that stuff be, it
> wouldn't have been just left in there. Give the programmers some credit,
> even if you don't think they're that great. They wouldn't have left
> something that gives away object passwords to uncreditied bots or
> applications.

Well how am I to know since I don't program (hence, I don't use the SDK) and given AW programmer track record it wouldn't be beyond them to make such an error. Credit is EARNED, not given mindlessly away.

>
> Says he who plays games all the time and is the self proclaimed "expert" on
> them.

I never claimed I was an expert at games; and I hardly play them all the time--in fact, I don't like many computer/video games. <shrug>

> By the way, stop changing the "reply to newsgroup." If you don't like what
> I'm saying that's fine, ignore it then. It makes no emphasis on your point
> either. Just get's rather annoying to have to change it whenever I reply to
> you when you don't like the discussion.

Just keeping you own your toes, sport. Take your own advice and don't reply to this message, hypocrite.

1  |   Order by index