|
Re: American Support (General Discussion)
Re: American Support // General Discussion
Mar 6, 2003, 6:48pm
First off... you just listed all of our "allies". Secondly... just how
many ruthless dictators do you think one country can deal with at a time?
Come on! If the UN were on the ball, that list would be dealt with already.
A lot of culture will be destroyed by bombs? Sure, if you're the Taliban.
But I think Rumsfeld is a little more concerned about hitting military
targets than Budha statues. You're speaking from hearsay. Stick to the
facts. Not the What-ifs.
Chris
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3E67A215.6BC7238B at oct31.de...
> Pakistan has nuclear weapons and does not care much about human rights
>
> India has nuclear weapons and there's much killing going on there
>
> Turkey has quite a big army and human rights count not much there
>
> China - wait, they are already on the list, further down
>
> France has nuclear weapons and - hm, their strategic position in Europe
isn't bad
>
> Germany ... oops, I don't want to give Rambo Bush ideas
>
>
> Fact is - there is no legal(!) reason for a war between the US and Iraq,
> I don't mind if Hussein is killed somehow but no reason to kill
> thousands of civilians, destroy the already poor economy completely
> and add Iraq to the countries that will not survive on their own.
> Last not least, a lot of culture will be destroyed by bombs.
>
>
> binarybud wrote:
because it will compromise our intelligence sources, we cannot show this
undeniable evidence right now. Someday the WORLD will understand why we
have taken this hard stance against Saddam. He NEEDS to go. And for now
we are strong enough to take the heat. Bu we must stand strong against
Saddam, or his neighbors will ALL pay the price...and we cannot afford to
let that happen..
news:3e678c10$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
veto to
, and
|
|
