1  |   Order by index

Mar 7, 2003, 6:04pm

"count dracula" <dracula at netsonic.fi> wrote in
news:3e68de96$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:

> I just find it suspisious that as soon as you get a new president,
> Iraque turns into a danger over one night.
> How come USA did not attack 1 year ago or 2 years ago?
> So basically, if you can have waited 2-3 years, a few months more will
> not hurt, will it ?

Bill Clinton was a democrat. George W. Bush is a republican. That's why.
They tried for a peacefull resolution during the nineties, you have to
acknownledge that. Iraq is not exactly keen to cooperate with the UN and
the rest of the world, there is some truth in the US and UK's dismissal of
the apparent Iraqui cooperation (that they're just playing games, first
saying they won't comply, then change direction at the last moment). The US
and UK did attacked Iraq 3 years ago too...

KAH

1  |   Order by index