1  |   Order by index

Mar 11, 2003, 2:23am

All of my arguements are factually based. Yours are not. Guess who would
win in a debate?

1. I'm not racist. So I can't be a Nazi. References available upon
request.
2. I personally think Bush should ease off of Iraq and concentrate on Iran.
In light of recent news, a nuclear Iran could sweep in and usurp a
militarily weakened Iraq. But since policy can't be changed that quickly,
and Saddam is still a credible threat (i.e. Better safe than sorry), I
support military action. I do not support my government's actions or their
motives 100%. You want an example? I just gave you one.
3. Saddam's had 12 years. I'm not trigger happy. I'm sick of the UN's
endless resolutions and sympathetic to a country's exiles who are crying out
and asking for someone to do something about Saddam. This whole situation
reminds me of Rwanda, which also asked for help, but the UN did nothing.
4. Ignorant? Perhaps it is you that is that. I can back up my arguments
with facts. Can you?
5. Paranoid? Better safe than sorry. If you call that paranoid, then I
say to you that you need a finer command of the English language. :) I'm
prudent.
6. Stupid? Again, my arguements are factually based.

Chris

[View Quote]

1  |   Order by index