1  |   Order by index

Mar 11, 2003, 8:10pm

> used, but I cannot back it up ( maybe I simply should say: I have proof but
> cannot give them out in the name of national security, because that is whar
> the rest of the word is supposed to be pleased with when asking USA for
> proofs).

The difference is your information doesn't rely on people being in dangerous
situations to gather intel. You may or may not know if they have evidence or not;
but if you say something like that where there's some proof you don't, then it's
horrible. Go ahead and prove Iraq doesn't have weapons, then I'll believe you.

Just because you can't see them doesn't mean they're not there. I suppose if you
face a wall in a dark room with your eyes close the wall doesn't exist either.

--Bowen--

1  |   Order by index