Chris: "Iraq was never a threat until after September 11, which happened SIX
MONTHS after Bush took office"
If this do not mean you are blaming Iraque for what happened Septemper 11th,
then I do not know what would.
Let me clarify then.
1. The War on Terrorism started after September 11.
2. The War on Terrorism's purpose is NOT to target ONLY the people
responsible for September 11.
3. Al Qaeda is responsible for September 11.
4. Iraq supports terror. It is a target.
Conclusion: Iraq has nothing to do with September 11. But it has something
to do with terrorism. Terrorism and Sept 11 are not the same thing.
[View Quote]"count dracula" <dracula at netsonic.fi> wrote in message
news:3e6d8e11 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Chris: "Iraq was never a threat until after September 11, which happened
SIX
> MONTHS after Bush took office"
> If this do not mean you are blaming Iraque for what happened Septemper
11th,
> then I do not know what would.
>
> I want you to wait until UN says it is ok, if you do not wait YOU (USA) is
> breaking the international laws. Not sure what is so hard to understand in
> that ?
> Funny thing is also that USA is planning to use chemical weapons in the
> attack; the same weapons that are supposed to be a reason for an attack.
> Contravercial I would say.
> USA has asked several European countries (Finland ) including to kick out
> some iraqi diplomats, the reason they said was that they are spys; funny
> comming from a country which reads other peoples e-mails and listen to
> phones of the memebers of UN ( security council).
>
> You say peace at any price is nuts; maybe so, but war at any price is
worse
> in my opinion.
>
> What I would like to hear ? I would like to hear the truth from Bush, not
> mumble jumlbe about going in to resque the iraqi ppl.
> All reasons I have heard so far has sounded like cover ups. Blix has not
> found anything that would be a reason for a war.
> USA claims Iraque has illegal weapons, how come nobody finds them? Cannot
> USA simply show on a map where to look then? One would not belive that
would
> give away any strategies.
> Somehow it seems to me, that if USA has some proofs and refuse to give
them,
> is simply because they would get busted also, a bit like a burgler beeing
> witness to a murder. If he goes to the police he will get busted also.
>
> Drac
>
>
>
> sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
> viestissä:3e6d669c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
USA
> has
> called
> then
say
> in
have
> USA
one
people
> not
> lying
That
can.
> in
driverslicense,
> SIX
> president,
> more
> hurry?
inspectors
simply
> is
> the
>
>
|
