|
Citizenship Disabled (General Discussion)
Citizenship Disabled // General Discussion
Aug 8, 2003, 12:10pm
Maybe you'd be kind enough to tell me as I havn't done anything.
~John
[View Quote]"mountain myst" <kellie at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3f33a9a6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Did anyone stop to think that perhaps this had nothing to do with why
John's
> citizenship was disabled and that perhaps there are other reasons as to
why
> it was?
>
> --
> Warm Regards,
> Kellie Williams/Mountain Myst
> Community Services
> www.activeworlds.com
> Please include previous email dialog in all replies.
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f33a6c8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
for
beta
> AW.
wrote:
foolish
> patched
> wrote:
the
He
> warning
didn't
> the
> hate
> they
> world
> not
>
>
|
Aug 8, 2003, 12:10pm
Thats the only reason we have!?
Aug 8, 2003, 12:14pm
Perhaps it involved a telegram to bill? :)
-Joe
[View Quote]"john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
news:3f33af3b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Maybe you'd be kind enough to tell me as I havn't done anything.
>
> ~John
>
> "mountain myst" <kellie at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3f33a9a6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> John's
> why
a
> for
have
older
to
contrary,
> beta
by
I
> wrote:
> foolish
> the
them.
> He
> didn't
in
would
when
a
a
that
after
have
>
>
|
Aug 8, 2003, 12:16pm
Lol... I only sent those two telegrams for M a t t because he asked me too
~John
[View Quote]"joeman" <joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
news:3f33b04c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Perhaps it involved a telegram to bill? :)
>
> -Joe
>
> "john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
> news:3f33af3b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
to
and
> a
compensation
> have
> older
issues
reason
> to
> contrary,
were
> by
as
> I
set
> them.
left
> in
> would
> when
into
> a
into
> a
the
> that
> after
just
> have
>
>
|
Aug 8, 2003, 12:24pm
A few suggestions to AW:
1) test pointer to and if non nill close the world properties forms
when a client exits a world. this should not be a problem since the
forms are not modal nor do they call modal forms.
2) wait for confirmation from an event world attributes to validate a
change.
3) optional - refresh the world attributes form values when an event
world attributes is received (has its pros and cons)
Alex
[View Quote]On 8 Aug 2003 08:54:22 -0400, "xelag" <xelag at digitalspace.com> wrote:
|
>What seems to be happening here is that the browser has a basic fault
>which should never occur: the browser aught to wait for a
>world-attributes event before it believes changes in the world
>settings have occured. This is a basic principle in programming.
>
>For clarification (thanks john): the world settings are not changed,
>but the browser believes they are. Since it is the browser that
>decides ultimately whether to fly or not (of course, normally it obeys
>the world settings received in world-attributes), if it believes it
>may fly, it will, even if the world settings do not allow it.
>
>Alex
>
[View Quote]>On 7 Aug 2003 14:50:05 -0400, "john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote:
>
|
Aug 8, 2003, 12:26pm
this is all i needed to hear your punishment was warranted.......sheeesh you gotta learn someday.
[View Quote]"john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message news:3f33b0bc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Lol... I only sent those two telegrams for M a t t because he asked me too
>
> ~John
>
> "joeman" <joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3f33b04c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> to
> and
> compensation
> issues
> reason
> were
> as
> set
> left
> into
> into
> the
> just
>
>
|
Aug 8, 2003, 12:28pm
yes, i did, but since aw is doing cryptic (and so are you, btw :) we
should wait, shouldn't we? there are 2 matters here: john's
bannishment, and a nasty bug in the browser. Has john been notified
of the reason of his bannishment? have we been notified that aw has
acknowledged this bug and will fix it asap?
Alex
On 8 Aug 2003 09:46:14 -0400, "mountain myst"
[View Quote]<kellie at activeworlds.com> wrote:
|
>Did anyone stop to think that perhaps this had nothing to do with why John's
>citizenship was disabled and that perhaps there are other reasons as to why
>it was?
Aug 8, 2003, 1:27pm
this bug is not in the 3.4 final release version. not just beta
-Mod
[View Quote]"xelag" <xelag at digitalspace.com> wrote in message
news:34r6jv4d3sk93ndnlo64524jbnserp1r10 at 4ax.com...
> Even if john was using a beta browser, this is a security issue which
> must be addressed by AW. Alpha and Beta testing software should only
> work during its allowed period (that is, if beta build 123 replaces
> beta build 122, build 122 should not be able to function, and so on).
> This might require that completely separate applications be built for
> alpha-beta testing (not using the normal build sequence), that would
> only work per build number, or that after a beta testing period, a
> forced upgrade be done (or both). Beta software should not be allowed
> to function outside the beta environment.
>
> Alex
>
> On 8 Aug 2003 05:22:02 -0400, "xelag" <xelag at digitalspace.com> wrote:
>
world
from
hack to
to see
find
you
where
previously
expoliting a
>
|
Aug 8, 2003, 1:34pm
That doesnt make sense :-o
~John
[View Quote]"mod" <mod at darkbirdie.com> wrote in message
news:3f33c173$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> this bug is not in the 3.4 final release version. not just beta
>
> -Mod
> "xelag" <xelag at digitalspace.com> wrote in message
> news:34r6jv4d3sk93ndnlo64524jbnserp1r10 at 4ax.com...
> world
> from
> hack to
> to see
> find
justified
world
> you
world
> where
world
> previously
> expoliting a
>
>
|
Aug 8, 2003, 3:12pm
Yeah we did... but we thought saying it on the NG would get us banned by
Bill.. lol
- Mark
[View Quote]"mountain myst" <kellie at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3f33a9a6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Did anyone stop to think that perhaps this had nothing to do with why
John's
> citizenship was disabled and that perhaps there are other reasons as to
why
> it was?
>
> --
> Warm Regards,
> Kellie Williams/Mountain Myst
> Community Services
> www.activeworlds.com
|
Aug 8, 2003, 4:02pm
*is in
[View Quote]"mod" <mod at darkbirdie.com> wrote in message
news:3f33c173$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> this bug is not in the 3.4 final release version. not just beta
>
> -Mod
> "xelag" <xelag at digitalspace.com> wrote in message
> news:34r6jv4d3sk93ndnlo64524jbnserp1r10 at 4ax.com...
> world
> from
> hack to
> to see
> find
justified
world
> you
world
> where
world
> previously
> expoliting a
>
>
|
Aug 9, 2003, 10:05am
"john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in
news:3f33b0bc at server1.Activeworlds.com:
> Lol... I only sent those two telegrams for M a t t because he asked me
> too
Very, VERY clever of you...
It's natural for AWI to assume that you used a hack when you flew around in
AWRPG after having proven that you have contact with a known cracker. And I
doubt AWI appreciate you sending telegrams for M a t t.
A ban is perhaps a bit harsh, although I can guess who banned you, but you
have acted like a fool.
KAH
Aug 13, 2003, 8:52pm
Don't they screen chat in public worlds using Customs Aide? >:-P
[View Quote]"john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
news:3f33a5b3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> How?
>
> ~John
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f33a53e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
misleading,
> Furthermore,
> level
the
AND
> PROCESS
IS
of
> must
use
> engineer,
> specifically
> otherwise
of
> to
labels
> on
enhancement
> or
to
> you
> shall
apply.
> intellectual
> or
licensors.
> United
> and
information,
by
> post
use
> THAT
> ALL
> OF
NON-INFRINGEMENT.
> and
> for
will
> misleading,
sole
all
STRICT
> SPECIAL,
A
> Agreement,
> Software,
> this
> out
sides
take
Tribunal,
> shall
for
sides
> statutory
arbitrators
> Libya,
of
> of
> the
> located
country
> or
agreement
Agreement
> reformed
> shall
> the
52.227-19
> Technical
similar
> bug
atcually
>
>
|
|