ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Re: newbiness (was Re: AW name history) (Community)
Re: newbiness (was Re: AW name history) // CommunityeepApr 1, 2001, 2:00pm
[View Quote]
[View Quote]
Ah but they were, twitfuck. Try not to quote blank lines, idiot newbie fuck. Drive through.
> As you have said yourself, Datamans page was created first and bears a very > similar look to yours which was created AFTER, so the copying was obviously > done by you who produced your page later. > > The later sections were available well before you arrived in AW and formed > the basis of most experimentation regarding animation in the early days. Oh...my...God. Can you BE any more dense, Moria? I'm sure you can. Let's see. What part of "added the introduction and basically everything up to "Creating Your First RWX model"" don't you understand, twit? Dataman's original page did NOT have those sections and were only added until AFTER my page went up (which was most certainly not ripped off Dataman's page. If anything I MAY have borrowed stuff from Grover's pages, but I link to his anyway. <shrug> Consider this my last response to you. Buh-bye now! > It also mentiones how to do something in C which with your accepted denial of > being a programmer you would have no idea how to do. <yawn> > It also goes into some > detail about the proporties of Truespace and COBTORWX, of versions before > your time, its also referred to in The New World Times, before your time. <yawn> Irrelevant to my point, twit. > Of course, all this thread has arrisen as an attempt by you to disguise the > fact that in your origional post you were WRONG about the name derrivation > of AlphaWorld and Active Worlds. Sorry, I wasn't. I was simply pointing out the truth to the unsure Peacfrog. > Two wrongs in one thread.. as I said, you screaming about something and > resorting to childish name calling doesn't make it right, it usually only > compounds the errors and proves that you have no rational argument to back > up your claims. <chuckle> You must have an odd definition of rationality, sport; I've been CONSTANTLY backing up my claims but you're too fucking cluelessly inept to see that. > Do you want to call Mommy (your killfile) yet and say mommy the big bad man > is annoying me take him away I cant cope and killfile me yet? or try > further to defend your stance that your documentation wasnt copied from > people who actually knew what they were doing before you arrived and sink > further? <yawn> "Bye-BYE!" |