ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Re: Prison Statistics (was Re: Why We War (was Re: Bin Laden's Special Song)) (General Discussion)
Re: Prison Statistics (was Re: Why We War (was Re: Bin Laden's Special Song)) // General Discussionmacb zzzzzNov 2, 2001, 1:39am
Well, I have to admit I don't have "the answer" about what to do about
crime. Statistics, on crime as well as many other things can be as much fun as those brain twisters that come in the books along with crosswords etc. I worked for a health related computer company once and one of the experts decided to wow me with the following statistic: There is a direct correlation between shoe size and mortality. Specifically, people with small feet die younger than those with large feet. Her plan was to roll that information into the questionnaire that we used to make longevity predictions for insurance companies etc. I asked her if the data had been normalized to account for infant mortality. Lots of people die at child birth and there are all sorts of terminal childhood diseases, these would certainly skew the data. Also, people who are sick when they are young often don't grow as rapidly as they would if they were healthy, not to mention nutritional issues. She got an expression on her face that screamed "I hadn't thought of that!!" and then excused herself. (I think she had already passed this great idea along to her boss). Anyway... on crime statistics. Stands to reason that capital punishment numbers would rise after it was reinstated. People convicted while capital punishment was illegal would not suddenly be eligible for it, only new convictions. States often changes their laws to coincide with federal laws, so some states had to re-authorize capital punishment after the feds did. Capital punishment cases take MUCH longer to finish than lesser crimes, for obvious reasons. Not unheard of for a capital offence to take 15 and 20 years to litigate. Am I saying that capital punishment prevents crimes? No. All we know for sure is that it prevents repeat offences. Does it promote crime? Possibly so... but I would like to see some arguments for that. I'm not sure I accept the notion that "enlightened" countries have lower crime rates. I won't tag specific countries here as being enlightened or not, but some things to consider: Punishments for crimes are extremely severe in the middle east. Amputations of limbs for crimes of theft. Life imprisonment for drug offences. Death by stoning for women who are too opinionated. I think they have fairly low crime rates. Some of the European countries (particularly the Scandinavian ones) have lower crime rates. They also have fairly monolithic cultures. Everyone gets along, because everyone is pretty much the same (culturally). The US is the most mixed up mixing pot in the world. That's a good thing in my opinion. But it does lead to some friction. And finally, many say that the US being the most capitalistic country in the world has lead to it being the most crime-ridden. I believe the correlation, I just don't accept the cause and effect relationship. One has only to look at the drastically different crime statistics WITHIN the United States to see that there are other factors that are more important to crime than anything that can be applied at the federal level. Wyoming: 16 murders in 1967, population 330,000... 17 murders in 1997, population 480,000... In 1998 the murder rate zoomed to 23. New York: 1967 996 murders, pop: 18 million... 1997 1093 murders, pop still 18 million, in 1998 murders dropped to 924. I think I worked that out to 20 percent more murders in New York. Should New York changes all its laws to match those of Wyoming? Or should everyone in New York MOVE to Wyoming? I'm pretty sure neither one of those changes would solve the problem. (But if everyone in New York moved to Wyoming, the murder rate in New York would drop to Zero, so....I guess that WOULD solve the problem for New York anyway.) I'm not sure of the old saw that says "statistics can be used to prove anything". But statistics alone will not provide solutions, only clues. Determining cause and effect is much more difficult, but that's what is needed before we can arrive at useful answers to the problems of crime. [View Quote] U.S. D.O.J., Capital Punishment Statistics http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cp.htm U.S. trends show that our capital punishment figures have been on the rise since capital punishment was reinstated in 1976. KCL International Centre for Prison Studies, World Prison Brief (Europe) http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/rel/icps/worldbrief/europe.html The following numbers represent total inmate populations. China: 1,427,407 (sentenced prisoners only) at mid-2000 (20th Asian and Pacific Conference of Correctional Administrators) Russia: 923,765 (at 1.1.2001 (national prison administration)) United States: 1,933,503 (at 31.12.2000 (U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics)) Áine ======MhM 23x20===Coolavin===Áine/AHNya=================== Imagine a moral code rooted in beauty, love, pleasure, and liberation instead of order, control, repression, and fear. ============================================================== [View Quote] |